Database Search Results
While the statute does direct the agency to issue regulations, it doesn’t specify any particular regulatory tasks beyond what is “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and to accomplish the purposes of the authorizing statutes. This provides broad discretion to the agency without delineating specific areas of regulation, so it falls under general authority.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority using terms like “necessary to carry out the duties” and “ensure that the purposes… are accomplished.” It doesn’t specify particular regulatory tasks or gaps to be addressed. This makes it a broad grant of authority, thus fitting into Hickman’s “General Authority” category.
While the statute provides a goal (to carry out the duties of the Director and ensure the purposes of the chapter are accomplished), it does not specify any particular regulatory task or gap that the agency must address. The language is broad and delegates significant discretion to the Director to determine what regulations are “necessary.”
While 12 U.S.C. § 4526 grants the Director rulemaking authority, it doesn’t prescribe specific regulatory tasks or gaps to be filled. It provides a broad mandate to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This falls under the definition of a general authority delegation.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority to the Director, tasking them with issuing regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director under this chapter or the authorizing statutes, and to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This language lacks specificity regarding particular regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed, instead giving the agency broad discretion to determine what regulations are “necessary.”
While 12 U.S.C. § 4526 mandates the issuance of regulations, it does so in broad terms, tasking the Director to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This is a general directive without specific regulatory tasks identified. This falls under Hickman’s “General Authority” delegation, which includes broad rulemaking authority.
The statute grants broad rulemaking authority to the Director, stating regulations should be issued as “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director… and to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” While it provides a purpose, it doesn’t identify specific regulatory tasks. It uses the broad term “necessary.”
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it does not define any specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed. It provides broad discretion to issue regulations necessary to carry out the Director’s duties and accomplish the purposes of the chapter and authorizing statutes, falling under the “General Authority” classification.
While the statute mentions the “duties of the Director” and “purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes,” it doesn’t specify particular regulatory tasks or gaps to be addressed. It grants broad authority to issue regulations necessary to carry out the Director’s duties and accomplish the chapter’s purposes.
The statute grants broad rulemaking authority to the Director to issue any regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” It does not identify specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed. It is a broad mandate to regulate as needed to achieve the overall objectives, thus fitting the “General Authority” category.
The statute provides broad authority to the Director to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This does not specify any particular regulatory task or gap, but rather delegates authority to regulate as needed to fulfill the agency’s mandate. The use of “necessary” is a broad qualifier that allows the Director discretion in determining the scope and content of the regulations.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority to the Director to issue regulations, guidelines, or orders “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director under this chapter or the authorizing statutes, and to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” While referencing the duties and purposes of the authorizing statutes, it does not identify any specific regulatory tasks or gaps, making it a general delegation of authority.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority using the phrase “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director under this chapter or the authorizing statutes, and to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” It doesn’t specify the regulatory tasks or gaps needing to be addressed, instead providing authority to issue regulations necessary to accomplish the broad purposes of the authorizing statute.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority (“shall issue any regulations…necessary to carry out the duties of the Director…and to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished”) without identifying specific regulatory tasks beyond implementing the Director’s duties and the general purposes of the authorizing statutes. The language is open-ended and doesn’t instruct the agency to address a specific regulatory gap with specific requirements.
While 12 U.S.C. § 4526(a) instructs the Director to issue regulations, it does so in broad terms (“necessary to carry out the duties… and to ensure that the purposes… are accomplished”). It does not specify which regulatory tasks or gaps must be addressed, leading to the agency determining what is “necessary.” This aligns with a general authority delegation.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority by instructing the Director to issue regulations necessary to “carry out the duties of the Director” and “ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This is a broad directive, not tied to a specific regulatory task. While it uses the term “necessary”, this term is open-ended and does not specify particular regulatory actions.
While the statute authorizes audits, it does not delegate specific rulemaking authority to the agency that is being audited or to HUD. The authority of HUD to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac comes from separate statutes (12 U.S.C. 1451 et seq., 1716-1723h, and 4501-4641).
While seemingly procedural, this statute specifies that the Agency and HUD “shall be considered agencies responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions” under certain provisions of Title 5. This directs the agencies regarding their responsibilities related to information handling, records, and meetings pertaining to financial institutions. It clearly instructs them on a specific regulatory task or gap, even if it uses open-ended terms within the specified framework of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it does so in broad terms related to carrying out duties and accomplishing the purposes of the chapter and authorizing statutes. It does not identify specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed, even with open-ended terms. It provides the agency broad rulemaking authority.
The statute gives the Director broad authority to issue regulations, guidelines, or orders “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” While the statute does define duties, it does not provide a specific regulatory task for the agency to fulfill in the statute text.
While the statute references the duties of the Director under the chapter and authorizing statutes, it doesn’t delineate any specific regulatory tasks or gaps that the regulations must address. Instead, it provides a broad mandate to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This falls into the “general authority” category as defined by Hickman because it creates the power to regulate without particular constraints regarding subject matter or specific desired outcomes beyond those already generally laid out in enabling legislation.
While § 4521 primarily deals with reporting requirements, subsection (a)(4) mandates a description of whether regulated entities are complying with procedures established pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 4012a(b)(3), which pertains to flood insurance. This requires the Director to examine and assess compliance with specific procedures related to flood insurance, thereby explicitly linking the statute to the regulatory task of ensuring compliance with flood insurance requirements. This qualifies it as specific authority under Hickman’s framework because it clearly instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task.
The statute specifically instructs the Director regarding the content and timing of the reports that must be submitted to Congress. While there’s room for agency interpretation as to how to collect and present some of the information, the core obligation and the subjects to be covered are clearly laid out. Therefore, the delegation is specific rather than general.
The statute specifically instructs the Director to make certain information available to the public, while granting discretion to withhold information under specific circumstances (contrary to public interest or threatening financial health). This falls under a specific regulatory task identified by Congress.
The statute specifically tasks the Director with making certain information publicly available, outlining the types of documents, circumstances for withholding, and retention requirements. It uses terms like “shall make available,” which is a clear instruction. While the statute grants some discretion using terms such as “contrary to the public interest”, the overall directive is explicit.