Database Search Results
The statute provides broad authority to the Director to issue regulations, guidelines, or orders “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This is a broad mandate without specific regulatory tasks identified. While it does provide some constraints by relating it to duties under the authorizing statutes, it is not specific enough to be classified as Specific Authority.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it does so in broad terms, directing the issuance of regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This is a wide grant of rulemaking power without any particular regulatory gaps or tasks specifically identified. It allows the agency considerable discretion to define what is “necessary” and how to best “accomplish” the chapter’s purposes.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it doesn’t provide specific instructions regarding what aspects related to the Director’s duties should be regulated. It delegates broad authority to determine what regulations are “necessary.” This falls under the definition of a General Authority delegation.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it does so in broad terms, stating they should be “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” It does not identify any specific regulatory gaps or prescribe specific regulatory tasks beyond these general goals. The use of “necessary” does not transform this into a specific authority delegation.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it does so in broad terms, using language like “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” It doesn’t identify specific regulatory tasks or gaps that the agency needs to address, making it a general delegation of rulemaking authority.
While the statute mentions “duties of the Director” and “authorizing statutes,” it doesn’t specify what regulatory tasks or gaps the agency should address. It provides broad authority to issue regulations deemed “necessary” to fulfill the Director’s duties and accomplish the chapter’s purposes, which fits the definition of a General Authority Delegation.
While the statute directs the Director to issue regulations, it does so in broad terms (“necessary to carry out the duties… and to ensure that the purposes… are accomplished”) without specifying particular regulatory tasks or gaps to fill. Therefore, it falls under the General Authority category, even though it uses the term “necessary.”
While the statute uses terms like “necessary,” it does so in a broad context, directing the Director to issue regulations to “carry out the duties” and “ensure that the purposes” of the chapter are accomplished. This gives the Director significant discretion to determine what regulations are needed to fulfill these broadly stated goals, classifying it as a General Authority delegation.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it does so in very broad terms. It does not specify particular areas or tasks for regulation, but rather directs the Director to regulate as “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and to accomplish the purposes of the chapter. This is a general delegation of rulemaking authority.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority to the Director. While it does instruct the director to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director,” it doesn’t identify any specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed. The statute uses broad terms like “necessary” and “purposes of this chapter” without providing explicit guidance on what regulations are required, thus making it a broad grant of authority.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority (“any regulations, guidelines, or orders necessary”) linked to the Director’s duties and the overall purposes of the chapter and authorizing statutes, without pinpointing specific regulatory tasks or gaps. It uses “necessary,” which is open-ended. Therefore, it is a general delegation of authority.
While the statute does mention specific duties of the director, it grants broad rulemaking authority using terms like “necessary to carry out the duties” and “ensure the purposes…are accomplished.” It does not define the exact regulatory task, therefore this is categorized as a general authority delegation.
The statute provides broad authority to issue regulations necessary to carry out the Director’s duties and the purposes of the chapter and authorizing statutes. While it identifies the general area of regulation, it does not specify particular regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed. Instead, it uses very open-ended terms like “necessary” to define the scope of the delegation, fulfilling the requirements for General Authority.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority to the Director to issue any regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” It does not identify specific regulatory tasks or gaps to be addressed, making it a general delegation of power.
While the statute directs the Director to issue regulations, it doesn’t specify which regulations or what specific regulatory tasks need to be addressed. It grants broad authority to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This is a broad grant of authority without defining the specific regulatory gaps that must be filled.
While the statute uses the term “necessary,” it does so in the context of broadly enabling the Director to carry out their duties and accomplish the chapter’s purposes. It does not identify specific regulatory tasks or gaps to be filled but provides overall rulemaking authority tied to the Director’s responsibilities as defined elsewhere in the chapter.
While the statute mentions “duties of the Director,” it provides broad authority to issue “any” regulations, guidelines or orders deemed “necessary.” It doesn’t specify particular regulatory tasks or gaps to fill. The terms “necessary,” “duties,” and “purposes” are open-ended. This falls into Hickman’s definition of a General Authority delegation.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority (“any regulations…necessary to carry out the duties”) without specifying particular regulatory tasks other than ensuring that the purposes of the chapter and authorizing statutes are accomplished. Although “necessary” is used, the scope is very broad.
The statute provides broad authority to issue regulations, guidelines, or orders “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” While using terms like “necessary,” it doesn’t specify particular regulatory tasks or gaps that the agency must address, therefore it’s a general authority delegation.
While 12 U.S.C. § 4526 states the Director shall issue regulations to carry out their duties and ensure the chapter’s purpose is accomplished, it doesn’t define specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed. The phrase “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” is broad and doesn’t focus on any particular requirement, making this a general authority delegation.
While the statute includes the phrase “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director,” it doesn’t specify any particular regulatory task or gap to be filled. Instead, it provides a broad directive to issue regulations deemed necessary to achieve the chapter’s purposes, relying heavily on the agency’s discretion. This broad mandate qualifies as a general authority delegation.
The statute provides broad authority to issue “any regulations, guidelines, or orders necessary to carry out the duties of the Director under this chapter or the authorizing statutes, and to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” While this ties the rulemaking to the Director’s duties and the statute’s purposes, it doesn’t specify particular regulatory tasks, but rather offers general guidance using the term “necessary.”
While the statute uses the term “necessary,” it grants broad authority to the Director to issue regulations to carry out their duties and accomplish the purposes of the chapter and authorizing statutes. It does not identify specific regulatory tasks or gaps, fitting the “General Authority” category.
The statute provides broad authority to the Director to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” This does not identify a specific regulatory task or gap but is tied to the overall responsibilities assigned to the director. The delegation is thus a broad grant of power based on duties instead of tasks.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations, it doesn’t specify what to regulate or how. It uses very broad language, indicating that the Director should regulate as necessary to fulfill their duties and accomplish the purposes of the chapter and authorizing statutes. This falls into the category of broad authority delegations.