Database Search Results
The statute, specifically subsection (c), provides a clear directive to the Director regarding the prohibition of cost pass-through. This constitutes a specific regulatory task, aligning with the definition of a Specific Authority Delegation.
The statute provides specific instructions on what types of mortgages and categories of families the regulations should address, as well as factors the director should consider when establishing targets.
The statute specifically instructs the Director to establish annual goals for mortgage purchases related to multifamily housing affordable to low-income families. It also provides factors for consideration and requires the Director to establish “additional requirements” for very low-income families, further narrowing the agency’s discretion. The statute identifies a specific gap and directs the agency to fill it via regulation.
The statute specifically instructs the Director to establish an annual goal for multifamily housing purchases. It also lists factors the Director must consider in establishing the goal, indicating a specific regulatory task with some constraints. Even though the Director has discretion to adjust certain parameters, the statute clearly defines the regulatory objective.
The statute provides a specific regulatory task: it details the circumstances under which the Director may adjust housing goals based on petitions from enterprises, and lays out standards and procedures for making this determination, including the requirement for public comment. While the language contains some open-ended terms like “market and economic conditions,” it is within the context of a clearly defined process.
The statute provides a clear regulatory task: the Director can reduce housing goals if certain conditions related to market, economic, or financial factors are met. This is not a general grant of authority, but rather a specific task tied to defined circumstances. The statute outlines the process for doing so, including public comment and determination timelines. The use of terms like “market and economic conditions” and “financial condition of the enterprise” gives discretion, but it’s discretion tied directly to the specific regulatory task of adjusting housing goals.
The statute specifically instructs the Director of the FHFA to require enterprises to charge guarantee fees and also specifies a minimum increase. While the Director has discretion in determining the precise amount above the minimum and in phasing in the increase, the statute clearly tasks the agency with a specific regulatory objective related to guarantee fees. The statute limits the Director’s discretion, furthering a specific mandate.
The statute gives very specific instructions regarding credit scoring models and directs the agency to validate and approve the credit scoring models, ensuring that they meet specific requirements listed in other sections of the U.S. Code.
The statute clearly instructs the Director to establish specific types of housing goals (single-family and multifamily) and even references further sections (4562 and 4563) which give even more specifics. While it uses broad terms like “appropriate adjustments,” the specific task of establishing housing goals is clearly defined.
The statute directs the agency (Director) to establish specific single-family and multifamily housing goals, referencing further sections that define these goals with more granularity (sections 4562 and 4563). While the Director has some discretion, the statute lays out a specific regulatory task (setting housing goals) and even provides some elements to be included in those goals. The statute includes open-ended terms like “appropriate” adjustments but falls within the Specific Authority Delegation category
The statute explicitly instructs the Director to establish specific types of mortgage goals for specific categories of families (low-income, families in low-income areas, very low-income). While there is some discretion in how the Director achieves these goals and the percentage targets, the what and who are laid out with substantial clarity in the statute. Additionally, factors like national housing needs, economic conditions and the financial condition of the enterprises are included to guide the agency in establishing the goal targets under subsection (e)(2)(B), which provides further instructions, further exemplifying Specific Authority Delegation.
The statute specifically instructs the Director on a particular regulatory task: establishing and maintaining a method of assessing the national average 1-family house price. While the Director has some flexibility in choosing which indexes to consider beyond those explicitly named (using “any other indexes or measures that the Director considers appropriate”), the core regulatory task is clearly defined. The statute directs the director to carry out a very specific function (creating an index) and even specifies what data they should take into account to that end.
The statute clearly instructs the Director on the specific regulatory task of making mortgage information public, including the specific data to be included (census tract level) and what not to include (proprietary data). The statute prescribes how the director should enact the legislation.
The statute provides a very specific task for the Director: to create an annual housing report with explicitly defined contents and data collection methods. The “other matters as the Director determines to be appropriate” clause does grant some discretion, but it’s tethered to the overarching specific goal of assisting the Director in analyzing the matters described in subsection (b), making the delegation specific rather than general.
The statute provides specific instructions on what the regulations must accomplish, such as prohibiting discrimination, requiring data submission, directing remedial actions, and reviewing underwriting guidelines. While there is some discretion in how these tasks are carried out, the statute clearly identifies the regulatory tasks and provides concrete objectives.
While parts of the statute are mandatory, there are also permissive elements. Subsection (a) provides discretion to the Director in determining what information shall be treated as proprietary, but it is tethered to specific statutory sections (4543, 1723a(n)(3), 1456(f)(3)). Subsection (d) mandates the Director to disclose certain mortgage data, referencing the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and section 4544(b)(6), indicating a specific regulatory task. These connections to other statutes demonstrate a specific delegation.
While the statute does instruct the Director to issue regulations, it does so in broad terms (“necessary to carry out the duties of the Director…and to ensure that the purposes…are accomplished”). It doesn’t specify particular regulations to address specific gaps or tasks. Thus, it falls under the category of providing broad rulemaking authority, aligning with a General Authority delegation.
The statute directs the agency to adopt data standards for specific information collections, indicating a specific regulatory task rather than a broad grant of authority. Also, the law refers to section 5334, further specifying its focus.
The statute specifically instructs the agency to make public data assets available as open government data, downloadable, in human-readable format, and accessible via API where appropriate. It identifies a particular task related to data publication, providing clear instructions on how the agency should handle its public data assets. Even with the open-ended “where appropriate,” it still fits the “Specific Authority” definition.
The statute clearly instructs the Director on a specific regulatory task: requiring prior approval for new products of enterprises. It defines the approval process, standards for approval (public interest, safety, soundness, and authorization under specific sections of other statutes), and even procedures for expedited review and temporary approvals.
The statute clearly instructs the Director on a specific regulatory task: to require and approve products of enterprises, setting standards and procedures for approval. While terms like “public interest” and “safety and soundness” are open-ended, the overall directive is targeted.
While the statute instructs the Director to issue regulations necessary to carry out their duties and accomplish the purposes of the chapter, it does not identify any specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed. The statute uses open-ended terms like “necessary” which could be interpreted as either specific or general authority. The broad nature of the mandate to “carry out the duties of the director” without specifying how regulations are to achieve that aim suggests general rulemaking authority.
The statute grants the Director broad authority to issue regulations “necessary to carry out the duties of the Director” and “to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.” It doesn’t specify particular regulatory tasks but provides general rulemaking power tied to the agency’s overall mission.
While the statute refers to the “duties of the Director” and “purposes of this chapter,” it doesn’t specify how the Director should achieve these duties or purposes through regulation. It uses broad language like “necessary” to carry out duties and accomplish purposes of the chapter. This falls under the “General Authority” as defined by Hickman’s framework. It offers flexibility but lacks specificity about which regulations to make.
While the statute directs the Director to issue regulations, it doesn’t provide specific regulatory tasks. The statute uses broad language, empowering the Director to issue regulations deemed “necessary” to carry out their duties and accomplish the chapter’s purpose. This falls under the umbrella of providing broad rulemaking authority without identifying precise regulatory objectives.