Database Search Results
The statute provides broad authority to the Director to manage personnel as “necessary to carry out the functions of the Director and the Agency.” It does not provide specific regulatory tasks but rather allows the Director to determine what is necessary.
The statute clearly instructs the Director on a specific regulatory task, specifically requiring reports from regulated entities regarding their condition, management, activities, or operations. Although the Director has discretion in determining what is “appropriate” or “necessary,” the statute provides a clear regulatory task to fill the gap related to monitoring regulated entities.
The statute 12 U.S.C. § 4514 specifically allows the director to require reports from regulated entities regarding their condition, management, activities, or operations. Part 1242, “Resolution Planning,” directly falls under this authority as it further outlines the specifics of the reports related to resolution planning, aligning with the purpose outlined in the statute and furthering the purpose of the chapter. The statute uses open-ended terms like “appropriate” which Hickman identifies as specific authority.
The statute clearly instructs the agency (Director) on a specific regulatory task: requiring reports from regulated entities regarding their condition, management, activities, or operations. It uses the open-ended term “appropriate,” but within a defined scope.
The statute specifically authorizes the Director to require reports from regulated entities, outlining the types of reports (regular, special, and related to capital distributions) and providing limitations on the information required, in order to effectively supervise these entities. While the statute uses terms like “appropriate” and “necessary,” the regulatory task is specific and well-defined.
The statute provides the Director with the explicit authority to require reports from regulated entities concerning specific areas like financial condition, management, activities, and capital distributions. While it uses open-ended terms like “as the Director considers appropriate” and “necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter,” the statute provides clear instruction on the regulatory task, making it a Specific Authority Delegation according to Hickman’s framework.
12 U.S.C. § 4513b(a) clearly instructs the Director to establish specific standards for regulated entities regarding a list of specific topics, like internal controls, risk management, liquidity, and record maintenance. This constitutes a Specific Authority Delegation.
The statute provides specific instructions regarding what the Director should regulate, including internal controls, risk management, liquidity, and record maintenance. Although some of the terms are open-ended (e.g., “appropriate”), the statute clearly directs the agency towards specific regulatory tasks.
The statute explicitly grants the Director the authority to require reports from regulated entities regarding their condition, management, activities, and operations. While this is broad in scope, it is a specific delegation of power to require reports, rather than a general grant of rulemaking authority without specific regulatory tasks identified. It uses terms like “appropriate” and “necessary,” which Hickman includes as Specific Authority Delegations.
While § 4514 does outline what the Director can require reports about, that directive is very broad and does not connect reporting to executive compensation. The statute grants the Director wide discretion to request information as deemed appropriate, without specifically directing them to regulate executive compensation. Therefore, it falls under the category of General Authority.
12 U.S.C. § 4514 specifically provides the Director with the “Authority to require reports by regulated entities.” This statute describes in detail the type of information that can be requested, including but not limited to financial statements, condition, management, activities, or operations of the regulated entity, it outlines the frequency of reports, and it also imposes penalties for failing to report, thereby clearly instructing the agency on its regulatory task. While “appropriate” is included as an open-ended term, the regulatory task and the scope is outlined and detailed.
The statute clearly outlines specific areas in which the Director must establish standards, such as “adequacy of internal controls,” “management of interest rate risk exposure,” and “maintenance of adequate records.” While (a)(11) does create a degree of flexibility, the statute does provide a listing of highly specific requirements of the Director.
The statute specifically instructs the Director to establish standards regarding record maintenance, fitting Hickman’s definition of a Specific Authority Delegation.
The statute specifically directs the Director to establish standards for a list of detailed topics (e.g., internal controls, audit systems, interest rate risk, market risk, liquidity, asset growth, investments, risk management, credit risk, and record maintenance). Even with the inclusion of the open-ended “(11) such other operational and management standards as the Director determines to be appropriate,” the delegation is still considered specific because it focuses on detailed tasks and regulatory gaps within the Director’s purview, clearly delineating the areas where the agency should act.
The statute provides specific instructions regarding the areas in which the Director must establish standards, such as internal controls, audit systems, risk management, liquidity, and record maintenance. It uses terms like “adequacy,” “appropriate,” and “consistent with the purposes of this chapter,” which Hickman would categorize under “Specific Authority Delegations.”
The statute provides a list of specific items (internal controls, audit systems, risk management, etc.) for which the Director shall establish standards. Even though the Director has discretion to determine the specifics of those standards, the statute dictates what areas the Director must regulate, using terms like “adequacy,” “independence,” and “appropriate,” which fall under the “Specific Authority” category as defined by Hickman.
While §4513 uses broad language like “safe and sound manner” and “public interest,” it is specifically instructing the Director to regulate housing entities and ensure they meet certain goals related to housing finance markets and underserved communities. The duties and scope of authority outlined in the statute provide specific guidance to the agency, making it more than just a broad grant of rulemaking authority.
While 12 U.S.C. § 4513 does provide broad oversight authority, it specifically instructs the Director to ensure safe and sound operations, adequate capital, and compliance. Part 1777 directly addresses this specific regulatory task by creating a framework to classify capital adequacy and prescribe corresponding corrective actions. The statute tasks the agency with very specific aims and the regulation responds to the specific instructions.
While the statute identifies principal duties and areas of focus (safe and sound operations, fostering housing finance markets), it provides broad discretion to the Director in how to achieve those goals. It doesn’t outline specific regulatory tasks but provides authority to oversee and regulate broadly.
The statute explicitly defines the Oversight Board’s advisory role to the Director “with respect to overall strategies and policies in carrying out the duties of the Director under this chapter.” It also instructs the Board to testify before congress on specific topics like “the safety and soundness of the regulated entities” as well as the “operations, resources, and performance of the Agency”. These are specified tasks, although they include open-ended terms.
The statute provides a list of specific areas (e.g., adequacy of internal controls, management of interest rate risk, management of market risk) for which the Director must establish standards. While some discretion is afforded through the use of terms like “appropriate” and “adequate”, the statute clearly instructs the agency on specific regulatory tasks related to prudential management and operations standards.
While the statute outlines duties and responsibilities, the regulations covered in Part 1271 reflect a broad rulemaking authority to implement the statute’s goals rather than specific regulatory tasks detailed by Congress. The statute provides high-level instructions and goals for the Director, and 12 CFR Part 1271 fills in regulatory details.
While the statute provides broad oversight authority, it specifically instructs the Director to ensure the safe and sound operations of regulated entities. The regulation regarding “new business activities” is a specific instantiation of that task, allowing the agency to review and approve new activities that may pose a risk to the safe and sound operations of the regulated entities. The statute uses terms like “safe and sound manner” and “prudential operations,” which Hickman considers to be indicative of specific authority delegations.
The statute clearly instructs the agency (through the Director) on specific regulatory tasks, such as overseeing operations, ensuring safety and soundness, setting capital requirements, and considering differences between Federal Home Loan Banks and enterprises when promulgating regulations. Even though terms like “appropriate” and “necessary” are used, the statute identifies particular tasks the agency is to address.
The statute instructs the agency director on a specific regulatory task (overseeing prudential operations and ensuring safe and sound operations, compliance, and public interest consistency). The statute also grants the director incidental powers as may be necessary or appropriate. This combination of broad duties and explicit enumeration of specific tasks qualifies as Specific Authority delegation under Hickman’s framework. The statute also specifically mandates that the director consider differences between federal home loan banks and enterprises prior to issuing regulations.