Database Search Results

The statute explicitly instructs the Director to issue regulations establishing specific standards, procedures, and time frames related to imposing, rescinding, and reviewing temporary minimum capital increases. This clear instruction for a specific regulatory task falls under Specific Authority Delegations.

12 U.S. Code § 4612(d)(3) explicitly requires the Director to issue regulations establishing standards and procedures related to temporary increases in minimum capital levels. Part 1225 fulfills this direct mandate.

The statute specifically instructs the enterprises to conduct a study reviewing underwriting guidelines and examining factors that inhibit mortgage access for certain populations. The statute includes specific areas of focus for the study (mixed-use neighborhoods, low-income families, down payment requirements, etc.). Although the statute does not require any immediate or specific regulatory action based on the study’s conclusions it tasks agencies with reporting “recommendations” based on the study, so a subsequent regulation altering practices or guidelines could be seen as arising from the report and thus traceable back to the statute. This specificity places it within the “Specific Authority” delegation category.

The statute mandates a study and report, but it does not explicitly mandate the creation of regulations to implement the recommendations arising from the study. However, the broader statutory authority provided in 12 U.S.C. 4501-4641, cited in the regulation’s authority section, authorizes HUD to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the “enterprises” referenced in the statute). Therefore, regulations addressing underwriting guidelines are authorized but not directly mandated by this specific statute.

The statute specifically instructs the Comptroller General, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director of the Congressional Budget Office to conduct studies on the privatization of FNMA and FHLMC. It dictates the content of those studies via its requirements, thus it is a specific instruction.

The statute directs specific agencies to conduct studies and report to Congress. While 24 CFR Part 81 concerns HUD’s regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 12 U.S.C. § 4602 mandates studies related to the potential privatization of these entities and doesn’t directly mandate or authorize the regulation outlined in the CFR. It is related because it concerns the same entities and their possible future status, which could affect how they are regulated.

The statute doesn’t instruct the agency on a specific regulatory task. It references regulations created under other statutes (Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act) and provides for a transition period related to their existence. These parent statutes contain broad authorities which enable the creation of 24 CFR Part 81.

The statute refers to rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary pursuant to the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act. It allows these regulations to remain in effect, be modified, terminated, superseded, or revoked. This indicates that the statute authorizes the creation of regulations, but it doesn’t mandate any specific regulation.

While the statute instructs the Board to “prescribe such regulations as it may deem necessary,” it does not provide highly specific instructions beyond the overall goal of “effectuate the purposes of this section and to prevent evasions thereof.” This falls under the umbrella of providing “broad rulemaking authority without specific regulatory tasks identified.”

The statute explicitly authorizes the Board to prescribe regulations necessary to effectuate the purposes of the section and prevent evasions. This is a direct mandate to regulate.

This statute provides clear instructions on specific regulatory tasks, including defining terms, determining what constitutes payment of interest and a deposit, and prescribing regulations to prevent evasions. The phrase “as it may deem necessary” falls under the Specific Authority delegation

The statute explicitly authorizes the Board to prescribe regulations necessary to effectuate the purposes of the section and prevent evasions. Therefore regulations directly mandated by the statute.

While some parts of the statute provide some discretion to the Director, the statute explicitly lists the conditions in which the Director may use civil money penalties. These are specific regulatory tasks that the agency has been clearly instructed to perform.

12 U.S.C. 4501-4641 is listed as authority for 24 CFR Part 81. This statute authorizes the director to impose civil money penalties and gives some direction on how those penalties should be determined and imposed; however, this statute does not mandate the HUD to create this regulation, rather the statute allows for it.

The statute gives the director the ability to decide what is in the public interest and gives them the authority to disclose certain documents. The language in 12 U.S.C. § 4586(a) provides the Director with the power to redact for public interest. This is specific authority even though the terms are open-ended.

The statute authorizes the Director to disclose certain information to the public, but it does not mandate any specific regulations to be created. The regulations could provide more specific guidance on how the director should make these disclosures or handle exceptions, but these regulations are not directly mandated in 12 U.S.C. § 4586.

The statute specifically instructs the Director on the regulatory task of determining the manner of service to provide actual notice. While “reasonably calculated” provides flexibility, the agency’s task is defined.

The statute “authorizes” the Director to provide service by regulation or otherwise, but does not mandate that they do so through regulation. The statute allows for alternative methods.

The statute grants the Director the specific authority to issue and enforce subpoenas in connection with administrative proceedings, which is a clearly defined regulatory task. The statute is specifically instructing the Director regarding a clearly defined task related to enforcement in administrative proceedings.

The statute 12 U.S.C. § 4588 authorizes the Director to issue subpoenas and conduct administrative proceedings. 24 CFR Part 81 regulates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, falling within the scope of 12 U.S.C. 4501-4641 as indicated in the authority section of the regulation. The statute authorizes actions related to administrative proceedings but does not mandate any specific regulation concerning subpoena power. The regulation is broader in scope than just subpoena authority.

The statute directs the Secretary to issue regulations to “implement this part.” This instruction, even though the section is repealed, specifies a particular task – implementing the broader statutory scheme – which falls under the Specific Authority delegation.

The statute 12 U.S.C. § 4589 explicitly relates to the issuance of final regulations to implement “this part,” creating a direct mandate for regulation. While the specific section is repealed, the nature of the delegation remains clear in the historical context.

12 U.S. Code § 4569 (j)(1) states: “The Secretary of the Treasury shall issue regulations to carry out this section.” This clearly instructs the agency (Treasury) on a specific regulatory task: to create regulations to implement the Capital Magnet Fund program outlined in the statute. Further, 12 U.S. Code § 4569 (j)(2) goes on to list “required contents” for these regulations, including audit authority and application/selection process requirements. These are specific instructions.

12 U.S.C. § 4569 (Capital Magnet Fund) concerns the Secretary of the Treasury and the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. 24 CFR Part 81 concerns the Secretary of HUD’s regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. While both relate to housing, the statute doesn’t directly mandate or explicitly authorize the HUD regulation. The authority for 24 CFR Part 81, cited in the regulation, does include 12 U.S.C. 4501 et seq, which is the general section of the statute creating the Federal Housing Finance Agency and some of its authorities.

The statute specifically details the grounds for issuing a cease and desist order, pointing to failures to submit specific reports or comply with specific housing plans as defined by other sections of the U.S. Code. The delegation clearly instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task.

The statute authorizes the Director to issue cease and desist orders if the enterprise fails to comply with certain reporting requirements or housing plans. This is authorized but not mandated; the Director may issue such orders, not must.

The statute provides detailed instructions on conducting hearings, including venue, timing, procedures, and the issuance of orders. It clearly instructs the Director on a specific regulatory task.

12 U.S.C. § 4582 directly mandates specific procedures (venue, timing, record keeping, etc.) for hearings conducted under sections 4581 and 4585, making the relationship directly mandated. The statute dictates specific actions the Director must take.

12 U.S.C. § 4583 outlines the procedure for judicial review of agency actions, specifying the court, the timing, and the scope of review. It directly instructs the agency (Director) on how to handle the record in the proceeding and implicitly authorizes regulations to facilitate this process.

12 U.S.C. § 4583 addresses judicial review of final orders issued by the Director under sections 4581 and 4585 of Title 12. 24 CFR Part 81 relates to the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, referencing 12 U.S.C. 4501-4641 as part of its authority. While § 4583 doesn’t explicitly mandate any specific regulation within 24 CFR Part 81, the broader authority granted by 12 U.S.C. 4501-4641, under which § 4583 falls, authorizes the agency to create regulations addressing actions reviewable in court.

The statute specifically empowers the Director to bring civil actions for enforcement, which is a clearly defined task. The statute identifies the regulatory tool (civil action) and the specific task (enforcement of orders).

12 U.S.C. 4584 authorizes the Director to bring civil actions to enforce orders issued under sections 4581 and 4585. This authorizes the action but doesn’t explicitly mandate the creation of regulations surrounding such enforcement. While regulations detailing enforcement procedures would be related to this statute, they aren’t directly mandated.

Subsection (c) of the statute specifically instructs the Director to create a regulation to prohibit enterprises from passing through allocation costs. This fits the definition of a specific authority delegation as it instructs an agency on a specific regulatory task.

Subsection (c) of the statute, 12 U.S. Code § 4567, directly mandates the Director to issue regulations prohibiting enterprises from passing through the costs of allocations.

The statute provides a specific regulatory task to the Secretary of HUD: to establish a formula for distributing funds to states based on defined needs-based criteria. Subsection (g)(2) gives further specific direction for what the regulations should include. It uses the terms “requirements” and “authority”, indicating specific instructions.

Subsection (g)(1) explicitly states: “The Secretary shall issue regulations to carry out this section.” This constitutes a direct mandate. Additionally, subsection (c)(3)(A) states “The Secretary shall, by regulation, establish a formula within 12 months of July 30, 2008”.

This statute gives specific instructions to the Secretary of HUD for creating and managing the Housing Trust Fund. Specifically, section (c)(3)(A) directs the Secretary to “establish a formula within 12 months of July 30, 2008, to distribute amounts made available under this subsection to each State to provide affordable housing” including the basis for such formula laid out in the following subsections.

12 U.S. Code § 4568(g)(1) directly mandates that “The Secretary shall issue regulations to carry out this section.” This establishes a direct mandate for rulemaking to implement the Housing Trust Fund.

While the statute includes the instruction that “The Secretary shall issue regulations to carry out this section.”, it doesn’t stop there. The statute continues on to describe in detail the contents for the distribution to the states, the requirements for eligibility, tenant protections, and limitations on the use of funds. The statute, therefore, clearly instructs the agency on specific regulatory tasks, making it a specific authority delegation.

12 U.S.C. § 4568(g)(1) explicitly states, “The Secretary shall issue regulations to carry out this section.” This directly mandates rulemaking, establishing a direct relationship between the statute and the regulation. 24 CFR Part 93 is the regulation implementing this statutory requirement.

While the statute grants the Secretary broad authority to carry out the Capital Magnet Fund program, it also provides specific instructions regarding regulatory content. Section 4569(j)(2) lists “required contents” for the regulations, including auditing authority, allocation requirements, accounting standards, and application/selection process criteria. These specific instructions qualify the delegation as a Specific Authority Delegation under Hickman’s framework.

12 U.S.C. § 4569(j)(1) explicitly states, “The Secretary of the Treasury shall issue regulations to carry out this section.” This directly mandates the creation of regulations. The provided regulation, 12 CFR Part 1807, is promulgated under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 4569, confirming the direct mandate.

While the statute provides broad goals (serving underserved markets), it specifically instructs the Director on how to evaluate compliance with these goals “by regulation” and lays out factors to consider in that evaluation (development of loan products, outreach, volume of loans, investments/grants). This moves it away from being purely a General Authority delegation and closer to Specific Authority.

Subsection (d)(1) explicitly states “The Director shall, by regulation, establish effective for 2010 and thereafter a manner for evaluating whether, and the extent to which, the enterprises have complied with the duty under subsection (a)”. This is a direct mandate to create regulations. The CFR part reflects that mandate.

Subsection (d) specifically instructs the Director to establish regulations for evaluating and rating the enterprises’ compliance with the duty under subsection (a). It further specifies the criteria to be considered in the evaluation, such as the development of loan products, outreach efforts, loan volumes, and investments. Although the specific manner of evaluation is left to the Director’s discretion, the statute clearly instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task.

12 U.S.C. § 4565(d)(1) explicitly states that “The Director shall, by regulation, establish effective for 2010 and thereafter a manner for evaluating whether, and the extent to which, the enterprises have complied with the duty under subsection (a) to serve underserved markets and for rating the extent of such compliance.” This directly mandates the creation of regulations to evaluate compliance with the duty to serve underserved markets.

While the statute uses terms like “appropriate” and “necessary,” it explicitly directs the agency (Director) on how to monitor and enforce compliance, to establish guidelines to measure the extent of compliance, and what factors to consider when assessing compliance. The delegation provides specific tasks for the agency to undertake.

12 U.S.C. § 4566 is listed as an authority for 12 CFR Part 1282. Section 4566(a)(1) states the Director “shall monitor and enforce compliance with the housing goals,” directly mandating action. Furthermore, 4566(a)(2) states, “The Director shall establish guidelines to measure the extent of compliance with the housing goals,” explicitly directing the agency to create regulations.

While the statute uses terms like “deems appropriate,” it clearly instructs the Director on specific regulatory tasks such as monitoring compliance, establishing guidelines, determining the extent of compliance, and requiring housing plans. These are specific actions, even if some discretion is afforded within them.

The statute explicitly directs the Director to monitor and enforce compliance with housing goals and establish guidelines. This constitutes a direct mandate to regulate.