Database Search Results
The statute gives the Secretary the authority to assess civil penalties for violations of regulations within a specific context (“under this chapter”). While the precise content of the regulations is not dictated by Section 1955, it empowers the Secretary to enforce regulations related to anti-money laundering. It provides a regulatory tool to address potential violations.
The statute grants the Secretary the authority to create regulations under the chapter without specifying the exact regulatory tasks. While it relates to enforcement via injunctions, the underlying regulations themselves stem from broader authority delegated elsewhere in the chapter, not defined in section 1954. Therefore, this section enables enforcement of regulations deriving from a more general rulemaking authority.
While the statute gives the Secretary the power to enforce regulations within the chapter, it doesn’t specify what those regulations should address. The statute delegates the authority to regulate without specifying the regulatory tasks to be addressed. Therefore, it falls under the “General Authority” classification.
While the statute addresses the enforcement mechanism (injunctions) related to regulations, it doesn’t prescribe what those regulations should be. It is a general grant of authority to create regulations within the broader scope of the “chapter” it resides in (which concerns financial recordkeeping and currency and foreign transactions), without detailing specific regulatory tasks or objectives. The regulations themselves define the specific requirements for money service businesses.
While 12 U.S.C. § 1954 doesn’t directly delegate rulemaking authority (that comes from elsewhere in the chapter), it specifically authorizes the Secretary to seek injunctions against violations of “any regulation under this chapter.” This implies a delegation of authority to create regulations within the chapter, and the delegation is sufficiently specific in that it ties the enforcement mechanism of injunctions to those regulations, which are those related to financial recordkeeping. While the rulemaking authority itself might be considered a more “general” delegation elsewhere in the statute chapter, the connection to injunctive relief makes it a specific authority in relation to this statute. The statute instructs the agency (Secretary) on how to react to violations, with the assumption that regulations exist or will exist.
While 12 U.S.C. § 1954 focuses on enforcement (injunctions), it inherently relies upon a prior delegation of authority to create the regulations being enforced. Looking at the “Authority” section of 31 CFR Part 1024 reveals 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 as a source. Examining those sections reveals a broad mandate to establish regulations related to financial recordkeeping and reporting of currency and foreign transactions. This lacks specific regulatory tasks and is categorized as a general authority delegation.
The statute directs the Secretary of the Treasury to make a determination about the usefulness of certain records for investigation and intelligence purposes, and then to issue regulations for specific types of financial institutions. While the term “appropriate” is used, the delegation still falls under Specific Authority because it is tied to a clearly defined regulatory task – implementing recordkeeping requirements for uninsured entities similar to those for insured banks under section 1829b, and assuring compliance with the chapter. Even with flexibility on how records are kept (electronic, etc.), the core task is recordkeeping related to preventing crime, tax evasion, and protection against terrorism. It is not a broad grant of authority to regulate the industry generally, but rather a specific directive contingent on certain determinations.
The statute identifies a specific regulatory task: establishing recordkeeping and procedural requirements for uninsured banks and financial institutions. It also defines the scope of institutions covered and links these requirements to the usefulness for criminal, tax, regulatory, and intelligence activities. This specificity, even with the use of the term “appropriate,” places it within the Specific Authority Delegation category.
The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to prescribe regulations concerning the types of records uninsured banks and institutions must maintain, with the goal of aiding criminal, tax, regulatory, intelligence, or counterintelligence investigations. While the statute uses open-ended terms such as “appropriate records and procedures” and the Secretary has the discretion to determine when such records are useful, it still falls under Specific Authority Delegation as it clearly instructs the agency on a regulatory task and defines a clear gap.
While 12 U.S.C. § 1954 explicitly refers to ‘any regulation under this chapter’ which suggests some limitations, the statute itself does not outline specific regulations to be created. It broadly allows the Secretary to create regulations, and this section provides enforcement for those regulations. Without knowing the authorizing statute that allows the Secretary to create regulations within “this chapter”, I cannot assess if that statute is specific or general. However, considering 12 U.S.C. § 1954 alone, it would fall under General Authority since it pertains to regulations under a broad chapter without explicitly outlining specific regulations.
While 12 U.S. Code § 1954 itself doesn’t directly delegate rulemaking authority, it references and depends upon regulations created under the same chapter. Given that the statute gives the Secretary authority to enforce regulations, the statutes authorizing those regulations would delegate “Specific Authority.” This section focuses on enforcement after regulations are promulgated, implying a specific task within a broader regulatory scheme.
The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to regulate recordkeeping and procedures for certain financial institutions, linking it to the usefulness of such records in investigations. While the statute uses terms like “appropriate records,” it clearly identifies the regulatory task: mandating recordkeeping and procedures for a delineated class of financial institutions to aid law enforcement and intelligence efforts. This is a focused task, even with the open-ended term “appropriate,” making it a Specific Authority delegation.
The statute provides specific instructions to the Secretary on what to regulate (recordkeeping and procedures of uninsured banks/institutions), who to regulate (uninsured banks/institutions and those engaging in certain financial functions), and why (usefulness in criminal, tax, regulatory, intelligence, and counterintelligence activities). It also references 12 U.S.C. § 1829b as a guide for the types of records to be required. While the Secretary has discretion, the statute identifies specific regulatory tasks.
The statute specifically directs the Secretary to require certain entities to maintain records and procedures that are “appropriate” for criminal, tax, regulatory, intelligence, and counterintelligence activities if the Secretary determines there is a “high degree of usefulness.” This fits the definition of a Specific Authority Delegation because it gives the agency a precise task within a broadly defined goal using terms like “appropriate.” Also, it is referencing 1829b, specific authority for insured banks.
While seemingly broad, the delegation to the Secretary of the Treasury in 12 U.S.C. § 1953(a) is ultimately anchored to specific investigatory needs (“criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings” and “intelligence or counterintelligence activities, including analysis, to protect against international terrorism”). Furthermore, the records the Secretary is authorized to require are explicitly tied to the types of records authorized under 12 U.S.C. § 1829b for insured banks, providing a concrete benchmark. This reference limits the scope and provides specificity. Subsection (c) provides further specific guidance with regards to accepting automated records.
The statute specifically instructs the Secretary on a regulatory task: to require certain uninsured banks and institutions to maintain “appropriate records and procedures” if the Secretary determines it has a “high degree of usefulness” for various investigations. While the terms “appropriate” and “high degree of usefulness” are open-ended, the statute provides the framework and the specific goal (useful recordkeeping) for the agency to regulate. Further, the statute references another section (1829b) outlining the type of records the Secretary is authorized to require insured banks to maintain, thus providing a benchmark for the regulations applying to uninsured institutions. The delegation also references specific institutions and activities in subsection (b), further solidifying that the delegation is specific.
The statute specifically instructs the Secretary on a regulatory task – requiring reports on ownership, control, and management of uninsured banks and institutions – when the Secretary determines those reports have a “high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings.” The statute also limits the type of information to “ownership, control, and managements and changes therein.”
While it grants discretion to the Secretary, it is specific. It instructs the agency to require reports on ownership, control, and management of uninsured banks and institutions when the Secretary deems them useful for criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations, using the term “appropriate” reports, placing it in the Specific Authority category according to Hickman’s framework.
The statute specifically instructs the Secretary of the Treasury on a specific regulatory task by providing that if certain conditions are met (usefulness in investigations, etc.), the Secretary may by regulation require uninsured banks/institutions to maintain certain records or procedures. It even references a specific section of the U.S. Code (1829b) as to what type of records to maintain. This is not a general grant of authority, but a targeted one.
The statute clearly instructs the Secretary on a specific regulatory task – requiring recordkeeping and procedures from uninsured banks and certain financial institutions. While the statute provides discretion to the Secretary to determine when the maintenance of records has a “high degree of usefulness,” this is exactly the use of an open-ended term, “appropriate,” “reasonable,” or “necessary”, mentioned in the definition of Specific Authority Delegation. Furthermore, the reference to section 1829b provides a defined scope of record types.
The statute instructs the Secretary on a specific regulatory task: to require certain financial institutions to maintain records and procedures if the Secretary determines that such records and procedures have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, regulatory, intelligence, or counterintelligence activities, with reference to another statute, section 1829b, further specifying the records that can be required. While the determination of “high degree of usefulness” involves some discretion, the statute gives specific parameters around the kind of regulation and the kinds of entities it can cover.
The statute clearly instructs the Secretary on a specific regulatory task: requiring reports from uninsured banks/institutions regarding ownership, control, and management. It also lays out the standard for when this authority can be used, namely “where the Secretary determines that the making of appropriate reports…has a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings.” While ‘appropriate’ leaves some discretion, it functions as an open-ended term instructing the agency on the scope of a task.
The statute specifically tasks the Secretary with creating regulations pertaining to reports from uninsured banks and institutions concerning their ownership, control, and management if the Secretary determines those reports have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations. This constitutes a specific regulatory task, using the term “appropriate reports” to define the gap, thus falling under Specific Authority Delegation.
The statute identifies a specific regulatory task: requiring reports on ownership, control, and management of uninsured banks/institutions if the Secretary determines such reports have a “high degree of usefulness” in criminal, tax, or regulatory proceedings. This goes beyond broad authority, even using the term “appropriate reports.”
The statute specifically directs the Secretary to determine when reports on ownership, control, and management of uninsured banks and institutions are “highly useful” for investigations. If the Secretary determines this is the case, they may require reports on those specific topics. While the trigger for regulation (determination of “high degree of usefulness”) is somewhat open-ended, the statute identifies a specific regulatory task and subject matter, aligning with Hickman’s “Specific Authority” category.