Database Search Results

While the statute applies the APA generally, it does so specifically to proceedings under Chapter 24 of Title 12, as well as 12 U.S.C. § 1829b. This focuses the delegation, applying the APA to specific regulatory tasks.

12 U.S.C. § 1959 directly mandates that the administrative procedure and judicial review provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapters 5 and 7 shall apply to proceedings under the chapter in which it is located (12 U.S.C. Chapter 24), as well as 12 U.S.C. § 1829b. Therefore, this statute directly mandates that the agency follow administrative procedure for those specific proceedings.

The statute specifically directs the Secretary to assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter (which presumably involves regulating credit card systems, given the regulation) and section 1829b of this title. Although “assure compliance” provides some discretion, it’s still a specific instruction to regulate within the defined scope of compliance.

12 U.S.C. § 1958 assigns the Secretary the responsibility to ensure compliance with the chapter and section 1829b. The Secretary may prescribe regulations to achieve this, making the statute-regulation relationship authorized but not mandated.

The statute specifically directs the Secretary to ensure compliance with the requirements of the chapter and authorizes the Secretary to delegate responsibility to supervisory agencies. This constitutes a specific instruction from Congress to the agency on a regulatory task, aligning with the “Specific Authority” delegation category.

The statute, 12 U.S.C. § 1958, explicitly mandates the Secretary to assure compliance with the requirements of the relevant chapter, thus making the regulation directly mandated to carry out the statutory requirements.

The statute assigns the Secretary the specific responsibility to assure compliance with the chapter and section 1829b of title 12. This is a directive to address a specific regulatory gap and carry out a specific regulatory task.

The statute (12 U.S.C. § 1958) explicitly mandates the Secretary to assure compliance with the requirements of the chapter and section 1829b and allows for delegation of this responsibility. This clearly falls under directly mandated. Furthermore, the regulation cites 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 as authority.

While 12 U.S.C. § 1959 primarily addresses the application of administrative procedures, the statute provides a specific, albeit limited, regulatory authority: to determine the effective date of the provisions within a certain timeframe. The specification to promulgate regulations with respect to setting an effective date makes it a specific authority delegation.

The statute explicitly authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to issue regulations regarding the effective date of the section. Furthermore, the regulation cites 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 as authority, indicating authorization, but not necessarily mandating specific regulatory action beyond the already specified allowance for determining the date of effect by regulation.

While 12 U.S.C. § 1959 mentions “administrative procedure,” it simply directs the application of 5 U.S.C. Subchapter II and Chapter 7 to the specified proceedings. It does not outline any specific regulatory task or gap to be addressed by the agency. The broad scope of 31 CFR Part 1010, covering definitions, programs, reporting, record-keeping, information sharing, diligence standards, rulings, enforcement, and summons, suggests the statute acts as a general grant of rulemaking authority rather than a specific instruction.

12 U.S.C. § 1959 directly mandates the application of administrative procedure (subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5) and judicial review (chapter 7 of title 5) provisions to proceedings under the chapter of Title 12 which includes 12 U.S.C. § 1959 itself, and proceedings under 12 U.S.C. 1829b. The CFR citation lists 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 as authority for the regulation. While section 1959 relates specifically to administrative procedure, the regulation appears to generally implement the chapter of title 12 to which it belongs.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to “assure compliance” with the chapter, indicating a regulatory task concerning the chapter’s requirements. While “assure compliance” is somewhat open-ended, it still instructs the agency on a specific regulatory objective.

The statute explicitly states that “The Secretary shall have the responsibility to assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter…” and may delegate such responsibility. This is a direct mandate to ensure compliance, thus requiring the Secretary to take action, including through regulations.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to assure compliance with the requirements of the chapter and section 1829b of this title. This constitutes a clear, even if broad, instruction on a specific regulatory task. The statute also provides the authority to delegate such responsibilities, which is still tied to the original task of assuring compliance.

12 U.S.C. § 1958 mandates the Secretary to assure compliance with the requirements of the chapter, implying a direct mandate for regulations to achieve compliance, as well as explicitly referred to by ‘regulations prescribed under this chapter.’

The statute provides specific authority because it clearly instructs the Secretary to assure compliance with the chapter’s requirements. While it also permits delegation to other agencies and reliance on state examinations, these provisions are ancillary to the core regulatory task of ensuring compliance, marking it as a directive tied to a specified regulatory task.

The statute explicitly states “The Secretary shall have the responsibility to assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter,” which directly mandates regulatory action to ensure compliance. The statute also allows for delegation of this responsibility and authorizes reliance on state examinations, both indicating a close relationship to regulatory functions.

The statute grants the Secretary the responsibility to “assure compliance” with the chapter and specified sections. While compliance is the specified area, the statute does not provide details or a specific regulatory task outside the scope of ensuring compliance. The authority is broad and does not identify specific regulatory gaps to address, thus fitting under Hickman’s General Authority category.

12 U.S.C. § 1958 mandates the Secretary to assure compliance with the requirements of Chapter 21 (which includes 12 U.S.C. §§ 1951-1959) and section 1829b of Title 12. 31 CFR Part 1024 implements regulations concerning mutual funds related to compliance with these sections, which falls under the Secretary’s responsibility as mandated by the statute.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to “assure compliance” and permits delegation. While “assure compliance” grants some discretion, it focuses on a clear regulatory task related to the statute’s chapter and section 1829b. The statute’s language gives the agency a specific task, which is to ensure compliance. It also allows for the use of regulation for setting effective dates, which further specifies its authority in the realm of regulating compliance with the chapter.

The statute 12 U.S.C. § 1958 grants the Secretary of the Treasury the responsibility to assure compliance with the requirements of the chapter, and the authority to delegate this responsibility. It also specifically mentions the authority to issue regulations in the context of effective dates, giving the agency discretion within a given time frame. While the statute mandates the Secretary to assure compliance, the manner and extent of regulations to achieve this are authorized but not specifically mandated, especially given that effective dates may be defined by regulation.

The statute explicitly defines the consequences for violating specific regulations. It creates a specific penalty which serves as instruction on regulations within the chapter.

The statute, 12 U.S.C. § 1957, directly mandates a relationship with regulations under Chapter 12, specifically creating a criminal penalty for willful violations of those regulations. Therefore, the statute directly mandates the regulations.

While 12 U.S.C. §§ 1951-1959, particularly sections dealing with reporting and record-keeping, grants authority to create regulations, 12 U.S.C. § 1957 operates as a ‘specific authority’ delegation, because it provides a clear directive: those who violate regulations created under this chapter will be subject to the criminal penalties stipulated within the statute. This specificity, focusing on the consequences of violating specific regulations, places it under the “Specific Authority” delegation category.

The statute (12 U.S.C. § 1957) explicitly imposes an additional criminal penalty for willful violations of regulations issued “under this chapter,” which includes 12 U.S.C. §§ 1951-1959. 31 CFR Part 1030 is issued under 12 U.S.C. §§ 1951-1959, meaning that regulations under 31 CFR Part 1030 are directly mandated under 12 U.S.C. § 1957. The statute directly mandates penalties for violating the regulations.

The statute explicitly instructs the Secretary to assure compliance with a specific regulatory task i.e. compliance with the requirements of the chapter and section 1829b. While it doesn’t spell out every single regulation the Secretary needs to implement, it clearly points to a specific regulatory goal, consistent with Hickman’s definition of a specific authority delegation. The statute also mentions the Secretary “may by regulation, provide that this section be effective on any date”. This again is clear authority for the secretary to make specific regulations regarding the effective date.

The statute 12 U.S.C. § 1958 explicitly states that “The Secretary shall have the responsibility to assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter and section 1829b of this title…” This direct instruction from Congress to the Secretary to assure compliance makes the statute-regulation relationship directly mandated, since regulations under the chapter (which Part 42 implements) are necessary to carry out this responsibility.

The statute instructs the Secretary of the Treasury to assure compliance with specific statutory sections (this chapter and section 1829b). While the specific methods for achieving compliance are not detailed, the statute clearly identifies the regulatory task: assuring compliance.

The statute explicitly mandates the Secretary to assure compliance with the requirements of the chapter and section 1829b. This directly mandates regulatory action to achieve compliance.

The statute provides the Secretary a specific regulatory task which is to “assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter and section 1829b of this title.” This is a specific objective assigned by Congress, even if the methods of achieving compliance are left open to the Secretary’s discretion. The statute provides a clear and specific regulatory gap/task that the agency must fill by issuing regulations.

The statute, 12 U.S.C. § 1958, explicitly directs the Secretary of the Treasury to assure compliance with the requirements of the chapter and section 1829b, implying that regulations are directly mandated to achieve this compliance. The statute also explicitly allows for delegation of the compliance responsibility and references “regulations prescribed under this chapter,” reinforcing the direct mandate for regulations.

The regulation, 31 CFR Part 1022, cites 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 as authority which includes the statute. The regulation implements the regulatory structure referred to in the statute, thus making the statute a specific authority delegation because the statute directly relies on those regulations, even by simply referencing them, to give them additional weight. The statute’s effective date hinges on the publication of related regulations, showing that Congress was aware the regulatory structure would implement a particular task and purpose.

The statute (12 U.S.C. § 1957) explicitly refers to and relies upon regulations promulgated under “this chapter” and other specified sections. Violations of these regulations trigger the statute’s criminal penalties, making the relationship directly mandated.

While 12 U.S.C. 1957 itself doesn’t delegate rulemaking authority, it is inextricably linked to regulations created under the authority of other sections within the same chapter (Title 12). The regulation, 31 CFR Part 1023, cites 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 as authority, and the statute enhances penalties for violation of these regulations. Thus, the statutes providing the rulemaking authority clearly instruct an agency on a specific regulatory task.

12 U.S. Code § 1957 explicitly refers to violations of “any regulation under this chapter.” This means the statute directly mandates the regulations, as it creates a penalty for their violation.

While 12 U.S.C. § 1957 doesn’t directly grant rulemaking authority, it enhances the enforcement of regulations created under specific sections of Title 12. Because it refers to regulations created under “this chapter” (which implicitly includes other sections delegating authority), and names sections 1829b and 1730d, and provides for specific criminal penalties, it fits best within the “Specific Authority” category, where Congress instructs an agency on a specific task or regulatory gap. The other underlying chapter sections give specific authority.

12 U.S.C. § 1957 creates criminal penalties for the violation of regulations issued “under this chapter” and sections 1829b and 1730d of this title. 31 CFR Part 1024 contains rules for mutual funds, and the authority section explicitly cites 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951-1959, thus, the statute directly mandates the regulation because it creates penalties for violating it.

The statute doesn’t specify what regulations should be promulgated. Instead, it creates a penalty for the violation of any regulation issued under the chapter. This provides broad rulemaking authority without identifying any particular regulatory task or gap to be filled.

12 U.S.C. § 1957 explicitly refers to regulations “under this chapter” and establishes criminal penalties for violating those regulations. This directly mandates a relationship between the statute and regulations.

The statute itself does not delegate authority. However, the regulation cites 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951-1959, and 31 U.S.C. 5311-5314 and 5316-5332, which authorize the agency to create regulations regarding banks and financial institutions and to ensure proper record-keeping and reporting to prevent money laundering. These are considered specific authority delegations because they concern specific regulatory tasks such as record-keeping and reporting.

12 U.S.C. § 1957 creates a penalty for violations of regulations “under this chapter” (Chapter 19). 31 CFR Part 1028 is promulgated under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959, a section within Chapter 19. Thus, the penalty applies to violations of 31 CFR Part 1028, and the relationship is directly mandated.

While 12 U.S.C. §§ 1951-1959 is cited as authority for 31 CFR Part 1030, § 1956 itself does not lay out any specific regulatory tasks. It provides for a criminal penalty for violating any regulation promulgated under that chapter. This is a broad delegation as the agency determines what conduct is prohibited, and then this statute creates the punishment framework.

The statute (12 U.S. Code § 1956) explicitly states a criminal penalty for anyone who violates “any regulation under this chapter.” This directly mandates a relationship where the regulations create the standard of conduct, and the statute provides the enforcement mechanism. The statute cannot function without regulations defining the prohibited actions.

The statute doesn’t instruct the agency on a specific regulatory task or gap. Rather, it provides a penalty for violating “any regulation under this chapter,” implying a broader, pre-existing rulemaking authority which would fall under General Authority.

The statute (12 U.S.C. § 1957) directly mandates the regulations under “this chapter” by creating a criminal penalty for violating them. If regulations are not issued, the statute has no effect.

While 12 U.S.C. 1957 creates a penalty for violating regulations under the chapter, it doesn’t directly instruct the agency to create specific rules or address specific regulatory tasks or gaps. The authority to create regulations is found elsewhere (namely, within the chapter referenced by 1957, and other listed authorities). The regulation, 31 CFR 1010, states the authorities for its issuance, including 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951-1959. Since the statute establishing the penalty doesn’t provide detailed instructions, and the enabling statute (authorizing the regulations) provides broad rulemaking authority, this is best classified as a General Authority delegation.

12 U.S. Code § 1957 explicitly refers to regulations under “this chapter” (which includes, among others, 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959) and 12 U.S.C. 1829b. It establishes a criminal penalty for violating those regulations. 31 CFR Part 1010 lists 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951-1959 as authorities. Therefore, the statute directly mandates regulations because it creates a penalty for violating those regulations. Without the regulations, the statute would be unenforceable.

The statute, specifically 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 & 1829b, authorizes the creation of regulations concerning financial record keeping and reporting of currency and foreign transactions. Although these provisions give broad authorization, section 1957 adds the penalty specifically to regulations promulgated under 1951-1959 & 1829b and therefore directly instructs enforcement.

The statute (12 U.S.C. § 1957) specifically creates a criminal penalty for violations of regulations “under this chapter” (referring to Chapter 1951-1959) and section 1829b of Title 12. The regulation (31 CFR Part 1020) is promulgated under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951-1959, among other authorities. Therefore, the statute directly mandates the enforcement of regulations established under its authority by prescribing an additional criminal penalty.