Database Search Results

The statute specifically outlines the requirements for state applications seeking payments. It instructs the Secretary on the criteria to be used when assessing these applications, including the description of intended expenditures, identification of populations in need, program coordination, and assurances of compliance. While some terms such as “assurances of compliance satisfactory to the Secretary” and “in such form, is made in such manner, and contains such agreements, assurances, and information as the Secretary determines to be necessary to carry out this part” are open-ended, they fall under the umbrella of specific guidance for the regulatory task of ensuring application compliance.

The statute, 42 U.S.C. § 300ee-13, authorizes the Secretary to make payments under section 300ee-11(a) contingent upon certain conditions related to state applications. While the statute outlines specific requirements for the applications, it doesn’t mandate the issuance of regulations to implement it. The Secretary “may not make payments” unless these conditions are met. This implies authorization for the Secretary to establish processes and standards for application review and compliance, but does not explicitly mandate regulation.

The statute identifies a specific regulatory task: defining the form, manner, agreements, assurances, and information required for grant applications. While the statute uses broad terms like “necessary”, it clearly instructs the agency on a specific regulatory gap that needs to be filled.

The statute explicitly states that the Secretary may not make a grant unless certain application requirements are met, and further grants the Secretary authority to determine the form, manner, agreements, assurances, and information required in the application. The regulation at 45 CFR Part 147 implements these requirements. The statute is directly mandating the implementation of application requirements, and granting the Secretary authority to define them.

The regulation, 45 CFR Part 147, cites specific sections of Title 42 U.S. Code (300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, 300gg-92, and 300gg-111 through 300gg-139), which suggests that the agency has been given specific instructions related to health insurance reform. The “Authority” section of the regulation points to specific U.S. Code sections, indicating that the rulemaking authority is tied to identified tasks or gaps in the statutory framework.

42 U.S.C. 300hh-12, concerning the Strategic National Stockpile, was renumbered as 42 U.S.C. 247d-6b. While the statute itself does not directly mandate 45 CFR Part 147, it concerns public health preparedness. 45 CFR Part 147, per its “Authority” section, relies on a broad range of 42 U.S.C. sections related to health insurance reform. Therefore, while not directly mandated by 300hh-12 (or its successor), the regulation is authorized under a broad scope of statutes, including ones concerning public health.

The statute provides very specific instructions to the National Coordinator and the HIT Advisory Committee. It dictates the convening of meetings, the identification of priority uses of health information technology based on specified criteria (e.g., quality of patient care, public health), and the publication of reports with recommendations. It also explicitly details the types of programs and areas the HIT Advisory Committee should consider, creating specific regulatory tasks. The inclusion of open-ended terms like “appropriate” by the Secretary also falls within Hickman’s definition of Specific Authority.

The statute, 42 U.S.C. § 300jj-13, authorizes the National Coordinator to convene the HIT Advisory Committee and identify priority uses of health information technology and make recommendations. It also directs the review of existing standards and the adoption of new ones. While it outlines a process, it doesn’t directly mandate specific regulations or standards to be adopted, but rather authorizes the agency to act in this domain. The explicit reference to the Secretary’s determination of “other priorities” also signals an authorization for broader action.

42 U.S. Code § 300x-8 defines terms and clarifies conditions for funding agreements. Although it empowers the Secretary to enter into funding agreements, it does not delineate specific regulatory tasks that the agency must undertake related to health insurance reform more generally. Therefore, using Hickman’s framework, while arguably the Secretary has leeway to define the funding agreement further, it is closer to General Authority because specific regulations are not identified within the statute.

42 U.S. Code § 300x-8 defines terms used within the statute and describes the conditions for funding agreements. While 45 CFR Part 147 pertains to health insurance reform and may indirectly relate to the types of programs discussed in 42 U.S. Code § 300x-8 (given that mental health services can be part of health insurance), the statute does not directly mandate or explicitly authorize the regulation of health insurance premiums, availability of coverage, or other aspects covered in 45 CFR Part 147. The relationship is, therefore, related, but neither directly mandated nor explicitly authorized.

The statute provides specific instructions regarding the Secretary’s duties related to withholding funds, conducting investigations, and responding to complaints. It includes stipulations for adequate notice, hearings, the qualifications of investigators, and the scope of investigations. Although some language is open-ended, the statute clearly instructs the agency on tasks relating to State compliance.

The statute outlines specific actions the Secretary shall take (e.g., withholding funds after notice and hearing), but also provides the Secretary with discretionary authority (e.g., investigations). Thus, while some aspects are mandated, other actions are authorized but not explicitly mandated, falling into category (b).

While certain subsections provide more general direction, the statute contains elements that clearly instruct the Administrator on specific regulatory tasks, such as publishing guidance for new systems demonstrating capacity (subsection (d)(4)) and modifying regulations concerning variances and exemptions for small public water systems (subsection (e)). Even where terms like “appropriate” are used, they are within a defined context.

The statute authorizes, but does not mandate, the Administrator to take certain actions, such as modifying regulations concerning variances and exemptions for small public water systems (subsection (e)), and to make grants to institutions of higher learning (subsection (f)). While the statute provides a framework and specific goals, it allows the agency discretion in implementation.

The statute provides definitions of “infection” and “treatment” specifically related to AIDS. These definitions are not broad grants of power, but rather specific instructions that clarify how those terms should be understood within the context of the subchapter, essentially telling the agency exactly what those words mean, in no uncertain terms.

42 U.S.C. § 300cc-51 defines terms used “for purposes of this subchapter.” While it doesn’t mandate any specific regulations, it authorizes the agency to create regulations related to the subchapter by clarifying the meaning of certain key terms, which impacts how the agency can implement and enforce the law.

The statute provides specific instructions for the agency, including the purposes for which grants should be awarded (e.g., enhancing screening abilities, educating healthcare professionals, developing educational programs), the entities eligible for grants, and approval factors (adoption of Advisory Committee guidelines). It uses language like “shall award grants to eligible entities to enable such entities””(1) to enhance, improve or expand…”.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to award grants to eligible entities to improve newborn and child screening. While the statute instructs the Secretary to award grants for specific purposes related to newborn screening, it does not directly mandate the creation of specific regulations. The statute gives the Secretary discretion in how to implement the grant program and provides some specifics.

The statute provides broad authority to the Secretary to support programs related to health information, promotion, prevention, and education. While it lists specific activities that “may” be supported, the primary authorization is broad (“is authorized to conduct and support…new and innovative programs”). This is not a direction to fill a specific gap, but rather a general mandate to support certain types of programs.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to conduct and support new and innovative programs in health information and health promotion, preventive health services, and education in the appropriate use of health care through grants and contracts. While 45 CFR Part 147 deals with health insurance reform requirements, it does not appear to be directly mandated nor explicitly authorized by 42 U.S. Code § 300u-2. The statute broadly allows for support of health programs, and the regulation broadly sets standards for health insurance, so they are related topically.

The statute, 42 U.S.C. 300x-26a, delegates authority related to substance abuse funding. While the statute itself is relatively narrow, the regulation (42 CFR Part 54) and related authorities cited in 45 CFR 147 (300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, 300gg-92, and 300gg-111 through 300gg-139) provide a broad rulemaking authority concerning health insurance reform, far exceeding a specific regulatory task. The statutory provisions listed in the regulation’s “Authority” section encompass a wide range of health insurance reforms, not just the narrow subject of the withdrawn code.

42 U.S.C. § 300x-26a related to withholding substance abuse funding under section 300x-26. The regulation 42 CFR Part 54 pertains to substance abuse and mental health services administration which falls under this category. The CFR references the US Code showing that the regulation is directly mandated.

The statute clearly instructs agencies on specific regulatory tasks. It uses precise language, requiring health insurance issuers to ensure coverage includes essential health benefits packages as defined in section 18022(a) and imposing limitations on cost-sharing under group health plans as provided in section 18022(c). This level of specificity aligns with the definition of a Specific Authority Delegation.

The statute directly mandates certain actions related to health insurance coverage, such as ensuring coverage includes essential health benefits and adhering to cost-sharing limitations, referring explicitly to other sections within the law.

42 U.S. Code § 300mm-31 specifically instructs the WTC Program Administrator to “establish a process” for determining screening eligibility, provides specific criteria for that determination, and mandates timelines and appeal processes. While the Administrator has some discretion, the statute clearly delineates the regulatory task and the scope of the Administrator’s authority, fitting the definition of Specific Authority Delegation.

42 U.S. Code § 300mm-31 concerns the identification and health evaluation of WTC survivors. While 45 CFR Part 147 broadly addresses health insurance reform requirements, it doesn’t directly mandate or explicitly authorize regulations concerning the WTC Health Program eligibility and processes. However, the statute and regulation are related, as the regulations concern health insurance, and the statute concerns a health program, and health insurance principles may inform the operation of the program.

The statute outlines specific enforcement actions the Administrator can take regarding violations of underground injection control programs, including issuing compliance orders and commencing civil actions. It details the process for administrative orders, factors for assessing penalties, and judicial review procedures, all pointing to a clearly instructed regulatory task, rather than broad, undefined rulemaking authority.

42 U.S.C. § 300h-2 relates to the enforcement of underground injection control programs, which aims to protect underground water sources. 45 CFR Part 147 focuses on health insurance reform requirements. While both relate to public welfare, one concerning environmental protection and the other health insurance, they are not directly mandated or explicitly authorized by each other. They operate in distinct domains, making them related but not directly linked.

The statute instructs the Secretary to develop and maintain a list of core antiretroviral therapeutics based on clinical guidelines. This is a specific regulatory task, even with open-ended flexibility to modify guidelines.

While 42 U.S.C. § 300ff-26 pertains to health, as does 45 CFR Part 147, the statute focuses specifically on HIV/AIDS treatments, while the regulation addresses broader health insurance market reforms. There is no direct mandate or explicit authorization connecting them; they are related through the general subject of health, but address separate aspects.

The statute provides specific direction to the Secretary regarding research, dissemination, the establishment of a review panel substantially similar to NIH’s, the composition of the panel, the frequency of meetings, the project review process, project scientific merit, and reporting requirements. Although the phrasing “as the Secretary may by regulation require” in section (c)(1) uses broad terms, the overall statute gives specific instructions related to the research, as Hickman would describe.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to make grants and enter into contracts, and subsection (c)(1) states that the Secretary “may by regulation require” certain application information. This indicates authorization but not a mandate to create regulations.

The statute directs the agency (presumably HHS, DOL, or Treasury, given the subject matter) to apply the provisions of a specific section (2707) to a particular segment of the health insurance market (individual market) in the same way they apply to group health plans. This is a clear instruction on a specific regulatory task, making it a specific authority delegation. While referencing another section grants some discretion, the core task of applying existing provisions is clearly defined.

The statute, 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-54, explicitly states that the provisions of section 2707 (regarding health insurance coverage) “shall apply” to health insurance coverage in the individual market. This is a direct mandate applying the rules for group health plans to the individual market.

While 42 U.S.C. § 300w-2 instructs the Secretary to make payments to states from their allotments, it does not prescribe the specific regulatory mechanisms or criteria to govern these payments beyond the broad framework provided. The regulations in 45 CFR Part 147 implement a much broader scope of health insurance market reforms, including aspects not directly addressed in § 300w-2, indicating a more general grant of rulemaking authority related to health insurance rather than a specific delegation tied to allotment payments.

While the statute mandates the Secretary shall make payments, the details and implementation of these payments are authorized through regulations. The statute provides a broad framework but leaves room for the agency to develop specific rules and procedures. The cross-reference to section 6503(a) of Title 31 and the allowance in subsection (b) for reducing payments at the State’s request still require agency interpretation and implementation through regulations.

The statute gives the Administrator the authority to provide for testing, in accordance with 21 U.S.C. 346a(p), of substances found in drinking water. While the Administrator has discretion in determining which additional substances to test (beyond those in 21 U.S.C. 346a(p)(3)(B)), the statute does instruct the agency on a specific regulatory task (testing substances) related to a specific problem (exposure to substances in drinking water). The agency has the power to decide if that testing is necessary to protect the population’s health.

The statute authorizes the Administrator to provide for testing of substances found in drinking water that may expose a substantial population, which is related to ensuring health insurance covers preventive health services (including screenings). However, it doesn’t directly mandate or explicitly authorize the specific health insurance reform regulations in 45 CFR Part 147, which cover a broad range of topics including premiums, coverage availability, and benefits.

The statute uses the term “existing authority” in connection with providing healthcare services, which suggests that Congress is authorizing the Secretary to use existing authority to arrange for providing health services but provides very little in the way of defining the method of service arrangement, beyond HMOs. It therefore delegates authority in a broad sense rather than instructing the agency on specific regulatory tasks.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to arrange for the provision of health services through health maintenance organizations but does not mandate that they do so. The language “is authorized” signifies permissive, rather than mandatory, action.

The statute provides the Secretary with the authority to make grants and provide technical assistance related to specific health conditions (hemophilia and HIV/AIDS). It dictates how grants for individuals with hemophilia should be made, gives parameters regarding planning grant purposes, amounts, duration, and preferences. Even the use of “may” provides discretion within the framework of specific regulatory tasks, thus qualifying it as specific authority delegation.

While 42 U.S.C. § 300ff-54 relates to health services and grants, similar to the subject of 45 CFR Part 147, it neither directly mandates the regulation nor explicitly authorizes it. The statute concerns specific grant programs for hemophilia and HIV/AIDS services, while the regulation addresses broader health insurance market reforms. Therefore, they are related in the general sense of healthcare but lack a direct or authorized link.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a lead exposure registry and an advisory committee. It details the membership of the committee and specifies its responsibilities, indicating specific regulatory tasks.

The statute establishes a lead exposure registry and an advisory committee, which are health initiatives. The regulation pertains to health insurance reform requirements. While both relate to health, the statute doesn’t directly mandate or explicitly authorize the health insurance regulations listed. The statute focuses on data collection and advice related to lead exposure, whereas the regulation sets standards for health insurance plans.

The statute clearly instructs the agency (implicitly HHS, DOL, and Treasury) on a specific regulatory task: defining and enforcing the requirements for “continuation coverage” as outlined in the statute, including the type of coverage, periods, and premium requirements. While there is some room for interpretation of terms, the statute lays out specific tasks and limitations.

The statute defines “continuation coverage” and sets requirements for it, but it does not directly mandate any specific regulation. The agency is authorized to interpret and implement these requirements through regulation, but is not strictly mandated to do so regarding every detail of the statute.

While certain sections of 42 U.S.C. § 300jj-11 such as (c)(5)(D) relating to “Conditions of certification” do give specific instructions (e.g., require the Secretary through notice and comment rulemaking…) most of the statute provides broad directives and authorities related to health information technology coordination, strategic planning, and setting up governance mechanisms. It delegates significant discretion to the Secretary and the National Coordinator to determine the details of implementation, standards, and policies within those broad goals. The statute does not contain precise regulatory tasks for the agency to fill in regulatory gaps, but rather asks the agency to fill the broader goals of electronic health information.

While 42 U.S.C. § 300jj-11 establishes the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology and outlines its duties, the regulation 45 CFR Part 147 implements broader health insurance reforms, primarily stemming from the Affordable Care Act. There is no direct mandate between the statute and the regulation. The statute focuses on health IT coordination and infrastructure, while the regulation covers various aspects of health insurance market regulations, such as premium fairness, guaranteed availability, and coverage requirements. The statute authorizes the Department of Health and Human Services to promulgate regulations, but the specific content of 45 CFR Part 147 is authorized but not directly mandated by this statute.

The statutes cited as authority for 45 CFR Part 147 (42 U.S.C. 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91, 300gg-92, and 300gg-111 through 300gg-139) provide broad rulemaking authority related to health insurance market reforms. The list of statutes allows for interpretation and development of specific rules, rather than directing the agency to fill a specific regulatory gap.

While the statute itself (42 U.S. Code § 300q-1) is repealed, it dealt with the allocation of funds among states. The regulations (45 CFR Part 147) deal with health insurance market reforms. Because 42 U.S.C. 300gg et seq. are cited as the authority for the regulations and address health insurance reform, and § 300q-1 used to concern allocation of principal, the regulations were authorized by separate parts of the USC, but not mandated specifically by § 300q-1.