Database Search Results

While 42 U.S.C. § 300cc-12 doesn’t delegate broad rulemaking authority, it instructs the Secretary to encourage specific actions (application for exemptions, use of drugs for treatment) and to publish findings. Because the statute directly references existing regulations found under 21 U.S.C 355(i), it implies specific instructions regarding how the agency should apply those existing regulations in the context of investigational new drugs related to AIDS. This leans more towards specific authority as it is tied to particular pre-existing drug approval regulation.

The statute, 42 U.S.C. § 300cc-12, encourages the use of investigational new drugs for AIDS treatment and prevention, referencing regulations issued under 21 U.S.C. § 355(i). While the statute encourages certain actions related to drugs and references existing regulations under a different title, it does not directly mandate or explicitly authorize the creation of new regulations under 45 CFR Part 147. 45 CFR part 147 generally relates to health insurance requirements.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to prescribe record-keeping and reporting requirements for loan recipients. This is a specific regulatory task, indicating specific authority. The phrase “as the Secretary shall prescribe” further indicates that the Secretary has discretion on the details.

The statute explicitly authorizes the Secretary to prescribe recordkeeping requirements and reporting procedures via regulation. While it doesn’t mandate regulations on every possible aspect, it clearly authorizes them related to the administration of assistance programs.

The statute specifically instructs the EPA Administrator to offer grants for particular types of projects related to safe drinking water. It sets limitations on the grants, including percentage caps on costs and the requirement for state agency approval. While the Administrator has discretion in determining which projects to fund, the statute lays out specific criteria and limitations, guiding the agency’s actions. The determination of a “useful purpose” relating to safe drinking water techniques offers some agency flexibility, but it is contained within an explicitly defined area of focus, making it a Specific Authority Delegation.

The statute authorizes grants for drinking water development and demonstration projects. While 45 CFR Part 147 deals with health insurance reform requirements, it doesn’t directly regulate the grant program established by 42 U.S.C. § 300j-3a. Although both relate to public health, the link is not a direct mandate or explicit authorization. The regulations concern insurance coverage while the statute addresses research and development of safe drinking water.

Although this statute is primarily about transitions, subsection (b) grants the Secretary the authority to recognize the AHIC Successor, Inc. as the HIT Advisory Committee. While it doesn’t mandate the recognition, it provides a clear regulatory task for the Secretary, meeting the criteria of a specific authority delegation.

While 42 U.S.C. § 300jj-18 itself doesn’t directly mandate specific regulations, it is explicitly authorized that the Secretary has power to recognize such AHIC Successor, Inc. as the HIT Advisory Committee. The statute sets the framework, allowing for administrative actions and decisions (potentially including regulations) to be made within that framework.

The statute provides very specific instructions to the agency regarding provider directories, response protocols, and cost-sharing practices. While it uses terms like “as soon as practicable,” it delineates the tasks the agency must ensure are performed, such as establishing verification processes every 90 days and responding to inquiries within one business day. This indicates a clear regulatory task.

The statute 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-115 directly mandates specific actions from group health plans and health insurance issuers, such as establishing verification processes, response protocols, and databases for provider directory information. The regulations in 45 CFR Part 147 implement and further define requirements related to health insurance reform, with the authority citation explicitly including 42 U.S.C. 300gg-111 through 300gg-139, demonstrating a direct mandate.

The statute specifically outlines the conditions under which the Secretary can take action (material failure to comply with agreements) and specifies the types of actions that can be taken (suspension of payments, termination of grant, repayment of payments, withholding of payments). The statute instructs the agency on how to address non-compliance and provides clear guidance for regulatory tasks.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to take certain actions if a state fails to comply with agreements, but it does not mandate specific regulations. The Secretary “may” take certain actions, indicating authorization rather than a direct mandate.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to request a study from the Institute of Medicine, or another entity, on barriers to HIV testing and recommendations for reducing perinatal transmission. It also mandates the Secretary to collect information from states and submit reports to Congress on the progress of these recommendations. These are specific tasks, directing the agency’s actions with a defined scope, rather than granting broad rulemaking authority.

The statute directs the Secretary to collect information regarding state actions towards meeting recommendations for reducing perinatal HIV transmission. While 45 CFR Part 147 concerns health insurance reform, including preventive services (potentially encompassing HIV testing and treatment), the statute does not directly mandate or explicitly authorize any specific regulation within Part 147. The statute informs policy and could influence future regulations, but the relationship is indirect.

The statute provides specific instructions to the Secretary, defining eligible entities, required activities for pilot projects, application requirements, matching fund requirements, and reporting requirements. While the Secretary has discretion in how to implement these provisions, the statute clearly outlines specific tasks and goals.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to award grants for pilot projects related to emergency medical and trauma systems. While the regulation (45 CFR Part 147) concerns health insurance reform requirements, there isn’t a direct mandate or explicit authorization connecting the two. The connection exists on the periphery since trauma centers would need to bill for their services through insurance which these regulations may affect.

While the statute provides discretion to the Secretary (“as the Secretary determines to be necessary”), it specifically identifies the regulatory task the agency must fulfill: ensuring that states provide reports and audits that allow the Secretary to track the use of funds, determine compliance, and assess administrative expenses. The statute outlines specific information categories that the Secretary’s requests must cover, defining the contours of the authorized regulatory action.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to request reports and audits from states as a condition for receiving payments. While the statute outlines the general requirements for these reports and audits, it doesn’t mandate specific regulations to implement them. The Secretary has discretion (“as the Secretary determines to be necessary”) to determine the form and content of the reports.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary of HHS to establish an office within the CDC and to develop/implement prevention programs targeting minority populations for AIDS prevention. This involves a specific regulatory task, making it a Specific Authority Delegation.

The statute directs the Secretary of HHS to establish an office and develop/implement prevention programs targeting minority populations. While the statute mandates this action, the specifics of how these programs are developed and implemented are authorized, but not mandated, leaving room for agency discretion within the stated objective.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to establish an advisory committee with clearly defined duties related to children and disasters. While the term “appropriate” is used regarding advice on activities pursuant to section 300hh-16, this does not change the fact that the specific regulatory task (advisory committee) is identified.

The statute creates an advisory committee that may provide advice to the Secretary regarding medical and public health grants and cooperative agreements authorized under certain subchapters. While the regulation (45 CFR Part 147) deals with health insurance reform requirements, and the statute deals with children and disasters, there is no direct mandate nor explicit authorization for the regulation within the statute. However, there is a relationship since the subject of the committee could overlap with some aspects of the regulation.

42 U.S. Code § 300g-5 grants the EPA the power to regulate in very explicit circumstances (subsection d). The delegation specifically relates to the review of State exemptions, publishing notice, potentially revoking or revising schedules, and creating regulations for reasonable time for applications. These are not broad authorities to regulate generally, but tailored and specific actions related to the statutory exemption process. The EPA has the ability to create regulations to implement and monitor exemptions.

The statute authorizes the agency (either the state or the Administrator) to grant exemptions from maximum contaminant levels and treatment techniques under specific conditions. However, it does not mandate that the agency must create or define these exemptions.

The statute provides a specific regulatory task by instructing the Secretary to issue regulations about what factors to consider when determining the applicable premium for self-insured plans. The language “such factors as the Secretary may prescribe in regulations” is specific.

42 U.S. Code § 300bb-4(2)(A)(ii) explicitly states that the Secretary may prescribe factors in regulations to be taken into account when determining the applicable premium for self-insured plans. The statute directs the agency to issue regulations on specific considerations.

The statute specifically instructs the Administrator to distribute lists, publish guidance, establish grant programs, and provide technical assistance related to lead contamination in school drinking water. These are specific regulatory tasks.

The statute concerns lead contamination in school drinking water and the regulation concerns health insurance reform requirements. These topics are unrelated.

The statute specifically directs the Secretary to solicit views from States and other entities when “carrying out this part.” This constitutes a specific directive related to a defined process (carrying out “this part”), even if the scope of “this part” might be broad. The use of “shall solicit” suggests a mandatory, though qualified, instruction on a procedural matter.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to solicit views, but it does not mandate rulemaking. The regulation in question appears to be related to implementing the broader health insurance reform efforts, and the statute provides a procedural instruction to the Secretary while carrying out the related statute.

The statute provides specific instructions on how the grant money is to be used. It also specifies the types of entities that should be included in the consortia (public, nonprofit, or for-profit in limited circumstances), and dictates various assurances and application requirements that the State must follow. The specific requirements are instructing the agency on specific regulatory tasks.

The statute authorizes states to use grant money to establish HIV care consortia, but it does not mandate that they do so. The use of “may” indicates authorization, not a direct mandate.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to conduct epidemiological assessments, develop state programs, and provide technical assistance relating to genetic diseases. This is a clear instruction on a specific regulatory task and gap.

The statute directs the Secretary to conduct assessments, develop programs, and provide technical assistance related to genetic diseases. While the regulation addresses health insurance reform requirements more broadly, it’s related to the statute’s overall goal of improving healthcare access and quality. The statute does not directly mandate or explicitly authorize the specific regulations outlined in Part 147, but the general subject matter overlap means they’re related.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary on the regulatory task: to monitor and ensure compliance with agreements related to the expenditure of funds provided to states under section 300ee-11(a), and provides specific tools to ensure compliance (repayment and withholding).

The statute grants the Secretary the discretionary authority to require repayment or withhold payments if states fail to comply with agreements. The word “may” indicates permission, not a requirement, to act.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary on calculating and distributing funds based on a formula factoring in population and AIDS cases. It specifies how to handle unspent funds, and what data the agency uses for the formula. This is a very defined regulatory task, indicative of a Specific Authority delegation.

42 U.S.C. § 300ee-17 specifies that the Secretary shall allot funds to states using a defined formula, leaving no room for discretionary interpretation beyond the confirmation of data and calculation. This creates a clear, direct mandate to the Secretary for action.

The statute specifically outlines the types of projects the Secretary can fund with grants and contracts (research, training, education, and counseling/testing programs related to genetic diseases). It also directs the Secretary to prioritize applications related to sickle cell anemia and Cooley’s anemia. This provides clear instructions on specific regulatory tasks, placing it under specific authority.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to make grants and enter into contracts for specific projects, but it does not mandate that they do so. The word “may” indicates this discretionary power.

The statute instructs the Secretary on a specific regulatory task: auditing state grants and posting the results online. It also states that the audits should be in accordance with the procedures of section 7502 of title 31. Even though there is discretion in selecting samples, the overall task is defined.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to reduce grant amounts if states fail to prepare audits, and mandates posting of audits on the internet. It authorizes the Secretary to select representative samples of audits and prepare summaries. While related to grant administration, the specific procedures for how to select samples and create summaries are not dictated, meaning regulation is authorized but not mandated.

The statute directs the Secretary to perform specific tasks related to technical assistance and the provision of supplies/services in lieu of grant funds, particularly with reference to states receiving payments under another section (300d-11(a)) and carrying out programs under yet another section (300d-11(b)). The statute provides details on how the technical assistance can be delivered (directly, through contract, or grants) and how the provision of supplies and services affects payments to the state.

The statute authorizes the Secretary to provide technical assistance and supplies/services, but it is not directly mandated in all cases; the provision of supplies/services is upon the request of a state. The provision of technical assistance is mandatory if a state receives payments under section 300d-11(a), but not all states are required to receive these payments.

42 U.S.C. § 300ee-20 offers a specific directive to the Secretary regarding providing assistance to states, including training, technical support, supplies, and even detailing personnel. This is a narrower mandate than a general grant of authority.

42 U.S.C. § 300ee-20 permits the Secretary to provide technical assistance and supplies to states. While it’s conceivable that some regulations under 45 CFR Part 147 might relate to programs where states receive such assistance, the statute doesn’t directly mandate or explicitly authorize these specific health insurance regulations.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to prescribe the “form and manner” of application submissions. While the terms “form and manner” are somewhat open-ended, they clearly instruct the agency on a specific regulatory task, related to the application process for medical facilities projects. The statute also specifies several items which the regulations “shall… set forth,” adding specificity.

42 U.S. Code § 300s-1(b)(1) explicitly states that “an application for a medical facilities project shall be submitted in such form and manner as the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe.” This directly mandates the Secretary to issue regulations concerning the form and manner of application submissions.

The statute provides a very specific set of conditions that the Secretary is authorized to require the states to meet in order to receive funding. These conditions relate to the use of funds, program objectives, accuracy of information, prioritization of certain programs, and evaluation criteria. The statute identifies particular regulatory tasks that the agency should consider.

The statute grants the Secretary discretion (“may not…unless the State agrees”) regarding payments to states, based on whether the state adheres to the specified conditions. This indicates authorization to establish these conditions, but not a direct mandate to regulate in every possible manner.