Database Search Results

The statute defines a set of “legacy provisions.” While it is specific in defining what constitutes these provisions, it doesn’t instruct the agency on what to do with those provisions. The rulemaking authority to establish the “Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses” for acquisitions using these provisions is a General Authority delegation.

48 CFR Part 52 explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as a source of authority. This indicates a direct mandate or instruction for the agency to act in relation to the provisions defined in 10 U.S.C. 3016.

While 10 U.S.C. § 3016 itself is definitional, it points to a collection of statutes (the “chapter 137 legacy provisions”). Those statutes, dealing with various aspects of military procurement, implicitly delegate specific authority by establishing the rules and framework for Army acquisitions, which would necessitate the use of forms to effectuate. This creates a Specific Authority delegation because the statute itself does not explicitly allow the agency to promulgate rules.

The regulation (48 CFR Part 53) explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. § 3016 as an authority. This indicates the regulation is directly mandated, or at the very least, authorized by the statute. Since §3016 defines Chapter 137 legacy provisions, and the regulation concerns forms used in acquisitions, there’s a direct link through procurement and the referenced code sections.

While the statute itself only defines the term “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing sections of the U.S. Code, the underlying provisions listed would provide more specific guidance. The regulation implemented must address procurement requirements, a specific area, even if the statute uses open-ended terms within those underlying provisions.

The regulation (48 CFR Part 6) specifically cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 in its authority section, indicating a direct mandate to implement and interpret the “chapter 137 legacy provisions” referenced in the statute.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines what constitutes “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing a series of sections within Title 10. It does not provide any specific regulatory task or gap that 48 CFR Part 8 must address through rulemaking. The statute provides the Department of Defense general authority regarding the legacy provisions.

The regulation, 48 CFR Part 8, cites 10 U.S.C. § 3016 (Chapter 137 legacy provisions) in its authority section. This indicates that the statute authorizes the regulation, but doesn’t explicitly mandate it.

The statute identifies a specific group of provisions – “chapter 137 legacy provisions”. It does not provide broad rulemaking authority. The statute identifies a specific area for regulation to occur. This makes it a specific delegation.

The regulation explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 and “chapter 137 legacy provisions” as authority for the regulation, meaning the statute directly mandates or authorizes the regulation. The statute defines what the “chapter 137 legacy provisions” are. The statute identifies which sections of Title 10 are covered by these legacy provisions. The regulations must be related to those sections, and so this is a direct mandate.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing several sections of Title 10. While this provides a legislative foundation, it doesn’t directly instruct the agency on a specific regulatory task or gap regarding value engineering or any specific regulation. Rather, it provides part of the broader statutory authority that could be used to justify the regulation.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 is cited in the Authority section of 48 CFR Part 48, which authorizes the regulation. However, the statute does not explicitly mandate the creation of regulations concerning value engineering.

While 10 U.S.C. § 3016 only defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” it does so by referencing a list of other sections in Title 10. The agency (in this case, the entity responsible for 48 CFR Part 49) then uses that defined group of sections in relation to government contract terminations. By explicitly referencing this statute when defining its authority, it suggests that the rule making is specifically implementing (or related to) those legacy provisions. Therefore, the statute instructs on a specific gap or task (contract terminations under the authority of legacy provisions), and that means it’s Specific Authority.

The regulation explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as part of its authority. This demonstrates a direct mandate because the regulation claims to be promulgated under the authority conferred by the statute.

While 10 U.S.C. 3016 defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” the regulations (48 CFR Part 5) implement those provisions by “publicizing contract actions.” The statute provides clear authority, which enables agencies to follow through on gaps and tasks involving the regulatory task in question.

The regulation explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as part of its authority, indicating a direct mandate to implement or relate to “chapter 137 legacy provisions” as defined by the statute.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 provides a definition of “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing specific sections within Title 10. The regulation (48 CFR Part 50) then uses the authority from “chapter 137 legacy provisions (see 10 U.S.C. 3016)” as an authority for the entire regulation. While seemingly broad, by including the statute in the authority section, it indicates that the statute provides clear instruction as to a specific regulatory task or gap that needs to be filled.

The regulation, 48 CFR Part 50, explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as one of its authorities. This means the regulation is authorized by the statute but not necessarily mandated.

While the statute itself defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” it does not specify any particular regulatory tasks for an agency. Instead, the statute is included as one of the authorities for the regulation which deals with contractor use of government sources. The regulation’s subject matter is a separate action authorized by but not specifically instructed by the statute.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 is explicitly cited as authority for 48 CFR Part 51. This means the statute authorized the regulation. There is no indication that the regulation was directly mandated.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions” which provides clear instructions regarding contract requirements. 48 CFR Part 42 implements and provides further detail on contract administration and audit services related to these legacy provisions.

The regulation (48 CFR Part 42) explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as a basis for its authority. This demonstrates a direct mandate because the regulation implements and references the statute.

The statute 10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines what constitutes “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing numerous sections within Title 10. It doesn’t instruct the agency (likely the Department of Defense or a component thereof) to take a specific regulatory action. Instead, it provides a definition that might be relevant to broader rulemaking authority stemming from other statutes (e.g., 10 U.S.C. chapter 4, which is also listed as an authority for the regulation). Thus, it falls under the umbrella of general authority delegations, since the statute delegates authority to create regulations concerning contract modifications.

The regulation (48 CFR Part 43) explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as one of its authorities. This indicates that the statute authorizes the regulation, but it does not necessarily mean that the statute mandates the regulation.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines the term “chapter 137 legacy provisions”. This definition, in conjunction with 10 U.S.C. chapter 4, provides a broad basis for the agency to develop regulations regarding government property without specifying precise regulatory tasks beyond defining a set of sections to be considered.

10 U.S.C. 3016 is listed within the “Authority” section of 48 CFR Part 45, indicating the regulation is authorized by the statute. The statute defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” which 48 CFR Part 45 implements in relation to government property. However, the statute does not explicitly mandate the creation of this regulation.

While 10 U.S.C. 3016 references “chapter 137 legacy provisions”, it does not specifically instruct the agency to create regulations on any particular aspect of quality assurance related to those provisions. The statute essentially defines a term and its relation to other sections. Therefore, the authority to create regulations around quality assurance using the legacy provisions is broadly delegated, falling under “General Authority”.

The regulation explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 within its “Authority” section. This indicates that the regulation is authorized by the statute, but the statute doesn’t mandate the regulation. The regulation likely interprets and implements provisions related to the chapter 137 legacy provisions which concern the Army, but the statute itself defines the provisions and does not demand specific regulations, just that the provisions apply.

10 U.S.C. 3016 defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions” and the regulation, 48 CFR Part 47, implements those provisions related to transportation contracts. This indicates a specific regulatory task related to those provisions.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 is explicitly listed in the regulatory authority section of 48 CFR Part 47.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines what “chapter 137 legacy provisions” means. This provides a clear, albeit definitional, task for the agency: to understand and apply the sections listed as “chapter 137 legacy provisions” within the context of service contracting. It doesn’t provide broad rulemaking authority but identifies specific sections of law.

48 CFR Part 37 specifically cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as part of its authority, establishing a direct mandate relationship.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing a series of sections within Title 10. It does not explicitly instruct the agency to create regulations, but rather defines a term used elsewhere in the code related to procurement. Because the regulation (48 CFR Part 38) is implementing policy relating to the listed provisions, the statute gives a broad rulemaking authority without the specific regulatory tasks identified.

The regulation (48 CFR Part 38) explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as one of its authorities. This indicates the regulation is authorized by the statute, but whether it is mandated would require further legal analysis of the other statutory authorities and the broader context of the regulation. Given the information available, “authorized but not mandated” is the most accurate classification.

While 10 U.S.C. 3016 is definitional, its inclusion in the regulation’s authority alongside 10 U.S.C. chapter 4 suggests that the regulation addresses subject matter covered by Chapter 4, which is tied to authorities listed in 3016. While not a explicit delegation for rulemaking, the “legacy provisions” defined in Section 3016 likely inform and shape the agency’s approach to acquisitions. 10 U.S.C. Chapter 4 is “Procurement Generally”

The regulation (48 CFR Part 39) cites 10 U.S.C. 3016, which defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions”, as one of its authorities. This suggests that the statute authorizes the regulation, but it doesn’t necessarily mandate it. The regulation addresses acquisition of information technology, and the statute defines a set of provisions. It’s reasonable to assume that Congress authorized the agency to create regulations regarding these provisions but did not explicitly instruct them to do so.

The statute specifically defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” which then provides a basis for regulations related to those provisions, specifically in the context of government contracting. This constitutes a specific regulatory task or gap that the agency is authorized to regulate.

10 U.S. Code § 3016 is explicitly listed as an authority for 48 CFR Part 4. This signifies a direct mandate, as the regulation is implemented with the backing of this specific statute.

The statute (10 U.S. Code § 3016) defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions” which, when coupled with “chapter 4”, provides instructions to the agency (in this case related to acquisition) on a specific area of regulation even though it doesn’t necessarily tell them how to regulate.

The regulation (48 CFR Part 41) cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as an authority. This means that the statute authorizes the regulation, but the statute doesn’t mandate that the regulation be created. It permits it.

The statute defines the term “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” and the regulation uses this definition as part of its foundation for establishing cost accounting standards. While broad in scope, defining terms used within statutes is a specific regulatory task.

The regulation explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016, which defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” as part of its authority. This indicates a direct mandate as the statute is a foundation for the regulation.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing specific sections. While not directing the creation of cost principles and procedures, it provides a specific legislative anchor for regulations related to those provisions. The explicit mention in the authority section of the regulation indicates a connection to the specific subject matter defined in the statute.

The regulation, 48 CFR Part 31, explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 as one of its authorities. This indicates that the statute authorizes the regulation, but does not directly mandate it.

The statute specifically defines “chapter 137 legacy provisions” to include a list of sections, indicating which aspects of Title 10 the agency should create regulations for, related to contract financing.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 is explicitly listed as an authority for 48 CFR Part 32 within the CFR’s authority section, indicating a direct mandate for regulation.

While the statute does provide a definition of the term “chapter 137 legacy provisions,” it does not provide specific instructions on how the agency should regulate or act with respect to those provisions. Chapter 4 of Title 10 is similarly broad. Thus, the statute provides broad rulemaking authority without identifying specific regulatory tasks.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 is explicitly listed in the “Authority” section of 48 CFR Part 34, directly mandating the regulation.

10 U.S.C. § 3016 defines what constitutes “chapter 137 legacy provisions” by listing numerous sections of Title 10. While this definition provides context, it doesn’t instruct the agency on a specific regulatory task. The regulation (48 CFR Part 35) generally addresses research and development contracting, and while it cites 10 U.S.C. § 3016 in its authority, the statute itself doesn’t outline specific R&D regulations the agency must create or update. The authority for the regulation thus stems from a broader grant of rulemaking power, especially given the cross-reference to “chapter 4” which encompasses the wider powers over the defense forces.

The regulation 48 CFR Part 35 explicitly cites 10 U.S.C. 3016 within its authority section. This indicates that the regulation is authorized by the statute. However, the statute itself does not mandate the creation of this particular regulation; rather it provides the basis for it.