Database Search Results
While the statute grants broad corporate powers, it also specifically directs the Farm Credit Administration to oversee and regulate certain activities of the Federal Land Bank Associations. For example, section 18 states “invest association funds in such obligations as may be authorized in regulations of the Farm Credit Administration” indicating specific regulatory tasks.
The statute specifically lists the regulatory tasks of providing for the organization of the association, initial stock amount, territory of operations, and approval of charter amendments. While these tasks are described using potentially broad terms, they are clearly defined areas of regulation, fitting Hickman’s “Specific Authority” category.
Subsection (c) of the statute provides the FCA with specific instructions on regulatory tasks related to the organization of the association, initial stock, operating territory, and charter amendments. Even though the statute uses terms that might be considered open-ended, such as “provide for”, these terms are still tied to specific regulatory tasks, fitting within the bounds of a Specific Authority delegation according to Hickman’s framework.
While the statute provides broad areas for regulation (“organization,” “initial amount of stock,” “territory of operations,” “amendments to the charter”), it does so within a specific framework of establishing and governing Federal land bank associations. The link to leasing, while not explicitly mentioned in § 2091, is a reasonable extension of the FCA’s authority related to the financial operations of these land banks. The statute specifically authorizes the FCA to prescribe “rules and regulations” to provide for these elements, including their organization, which can reasonably be interpreted as encompassing leasing activities.
The statute instructs the agency regarding the composition and election of the board of directors, even allowing for bylaws to dictate certain elements, using terms like “such number,” “such terms,” “such manner,” and “such qualifications.” This degree of instruction, even with open-ended terms, places it within the Specific Authority category as it addresses a particular area and gives the agency direction, however broad, on implementing the statute.
The statute outlines specific requirements for the board of directors of Federal land bank associations, including how they are to be elected and a specific restriction on one member’s affiliation. This provides a defined scope for any related regulations, fitting the “Specific Authority” delegation category.
The statute gives the Farm Credit Administration specific direction to create regulations regarding rural housing finance under subsection (a)(2). It also provides some bounds on setting interest rates in (c)(1) stating they “shall be determined under standards prescribed by the board of the bank subject to the provisions of section 2205 of this title, and shall be made upon such terms, conditions, and upon such security, if any, as shall be authorized in such standards.”
The statute provides specific direction related to the types of loans authorized and to whom they can be extended. It directs the Farm Credit Administration to develop regulations for rural housing financing, which is a fairly well-defined task. The statute also outlines standards for interest rates, terms, and conditions, implying a specific regulatory task.
The statute specifically instructs the Farm Credit Administration to prescribe regulations related to “financial related services appropriate to their on-farm and aquatic operations.” This identifies a specific regulatory task or gap, making it a specific authority delegation, even with the term “appropriate.”
The statute directs the Farm Credit Administration to prescribe regulations concerning “financial related services appropriate to their on-farm and aquatic operations.” This identifies a specific regulatory task related to those services, even if “appropriate” allows for some discretion.
The statute specifies a regulatory task: prescribing regulations related to financial services appropriate to on-farm and aquatic operations that production credit associations may provide. While the terms “appropriate” and “feasible” leave room for agency discretion, the statute directs the agency to fill a regulatory gap by defining the permissible scope of these services, thus giving the FCA a specific directive.
The statute specifically instructs the Farm Credit Administration to prescribe regulations, particularly for rural housing financing in subsection (a)(2), but more broadly for the terms and conditions of loans under subsection (c)(1) “as shall be authorized in such standards”. While some discretion is involved, it is focused on filling specific regulatory tasks related to these loans. The statute provides specific guidance on who can receive loans, for what purposes, and under what general conditions, and explicitly directs the agency to regulate in particular areas.
The statute specifically instructs the Farm Credit Administration to issue regulations regarding rural housing financing (subsection (a)(2)). It also mandates that interest rates and charges should be determined under standards prescribed by the board of the bank (subsection (c)(1)). While open-ended terms like “standards” are used, they direct the agency to fill a specific regulatory task and gap.
The statute provides details regarding the types of loans authorized, eligible borrowers, and factors to consider when setting interest rates, terms, and conditions. These provisions offer specific guidance for the agency in creating regulations, fitting the criteria for Specific Authority.
While the statute gives the Farm Credit Administration broad authority in one sense (“under regulations of the Farm Credit Administration”), the statute is focused on specific lending tasks, for specific purposes. It does not simply grant broad rulemaking authority over all Farm Credit Administration activities. The statute specifically directs the agency to regulate housing financing in rural areas. Although the precise contours of these regulations are left to the agency’s discretion, the statutory provision identifies a specific regulatory task.
The statute explicitly authorizes the Farm Credit Administration to issue regulations concerning rural housing financing in rural areas, fitting the definition of specific authority even with the open term “rural areas.” It also specifies parameters for setting interest rates.
The statute specifically directs the Farm Credit Administration to issue regulations governing the capitalization and stock management of production credit associations. This falls under the “Specific Authority” category because it identifies a precise regulatory task: overseeing the financial structure and stock operations of these associations. The statute also directs the FCA with “general directions” on available net earnings.
The statute identifies a specific area for regulation – the capitalization and stock management of production credit associations. While the language is broad (“subject to Farm Credit Administration regulations”), it’s focused on a particular regulatory task.
While the language provides the Farm Credit Administration with discretion to craft regulations regarding capitalization, stock issuance, holding, transfer, retirement, and earnings distribution of production credit associations, it does so within a specific framework. The statute identifies a specific regulatory task: overseeing capitalization and stock management. The terms “subject to Farm Credit Administration regulations” and “general directions of the Farm Credit Administration” fall within the “appropriate,” “reasonable,” or “necessary” standard outlined in Hickman’s Specific Authority Delegation.
The statute clearly instructs the Farm Credit Administration to regulate the capitalization, stock issuance, holding, transfer, retirement, and earnings distribution of production credit associations. This goes beyond a general grant of rulemaking authority by identifying specific areas for regulation.
The statute provides a specific regulatory task. The statute specifically instructs the Farm Credit Administration to create “regulations” for housing financing in rural areas. This falls under the specific authority delegation because it identifies a specific regulatory gap.
While the statute grants broad powers to the production credit association, it also directs the Farm Credit Administration to regulate specific aspects of the association’s operations, such as investment of funds, buying and selling obligations, and agreements to share loan losses. The statute uses the phrase “as may be authorized by the Farm Credit Bank under regulations of the Farm Credit Administration,” indicating specific regulatory tasks. This aligns with the definition of Specific Authority Delegations in Hickman’s framework.
The statute provides broad rulemaking authority to the Farm Credit Administration (FCA) to regulate the powers of production credit associations. While specific subsections of the statute refer to “regulations of the Farm Credit Administration,” the overall effect is a general mandate for the FCA to oversee and regulate the conduct of these associations. Examples: 12 U.S.C. § 2073(10), (11), and (15) all give the agency broad authority with open-ended terms such as “as may be approved” and “as may be authorized…in accordance with regulations.”
While the statute outlines specific powers of the production credit associations, the delegation of authority to the Farm Credit Administration is broad. The statute refers to “regulation by the Farm Credit Administration” generally, and in several sections (e.g., investment of funds, buying/selling obligations, loss-sharing agreements) uses the phrase “as may be authorized by the Farm Credit Bank in accordance with regulations of the Farm Credit Administration.” This gives the agency significant discretion in shaping the regulations governing these areas without being tied to specific, defined tasks. The statute grants broad powers to the Farm Credit Administration using words like “regulation” and “authorized,” without specifying the regulatory gap or task, therefore it fits the “General Authority” category.
The statute explicitly mentions “regulation by the Farm Credit Administration” when granting corporate powers to production credit associations. While it doesn’t specify what to regulate, it specifically identifies a regulatory task related to the governance and operation of these associations. The regulation’s authority section cites 12 U.S.C. 2073.