Database Search Results

13 U.S.C. provides authority for the census. While 13 U.S.C. § 15 is specific to leases, the general grant of authority to conduct the census and its derivative uses in 28 CFR Part 513 is too broad and doesn’t identify a specific regulatory gap or task. It is more of a general grant of authority.

13 U.S.C. is listed as an authority for 28 CFR Part 513. This means that the statute authorizes the regulation, but does not explicitly mandate it.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary to publish standards defining the content and structure of address information, develop timetables for review, and provide access to census address information to census liaisons. It outlines the specific regulatory task of improving census accuracy through state and local government interaction. Even though terms like “assist efforts” are present, the tasks are explicitly laid out.

13 U.S.C. is listed under the “Authority” section of 28 CFR Part 513. The statute authorizes the agency to create regulations related to record access, but it doesn’t directly mandate the specifics within 28 CFR Part 513.

The statute specifically directs the Secretary to conduct a census of governments every five years and provides a non-exhaustive list of the types of data that such a census shall include. Even though broad terms such as “governmental receipts” and “expenditures” are used, which allow for discretion in defining and measuring them, the statute is aimed at a specific regulatory task and provides a clear objective for the Secretary.

The statute mandates the Secretary to take, compile, and publish a census of governments every five years. The statute also provides some specifics to include in the census, but does not provide comprehensive direction as to the information-gathering and dissemination practices. The agency therefore has the authority to create regulation to effectuate the statute, but it is not necessarily directly mandated.

Although the repealed statute concerned the acquisition of data, and the regulation relates to the access and release of information, the citation of 13 U.S.C. in the authority section of the CFR suggests some relationship to the Census Bureau”™s data handling authority, it’s best classified as general authority. A specific authority delegation would have explicitly directed the agency to create access rules based on the source statute.

13 U.S. Code § 162, prior to its repeal, related to the acquisition of reports and material from governmental units, private persons, and agencies. 28 CFR Part 513 concerns access to records, including those held by the FBI/NCIC and the release of information to law enforcement. While both relate to information and its handling, the statute’s authorization is broader than the regulation’s focus. The statute is related to the type of information the agency might hold, but it doesn’t explicitly authorize, nor directly mandate, the specific access and release rules found in the regulation.

While the statute itself doesn’t specify the details of how the information collected will be accessed or released, the fact that 13 U.S.C. is listed under the regulation’s authorities strongly suggests that Congress intended the Secretary to create regulation regarding access to census records. 13 USC provides a specific regulatory task (census), therefore specific regulation around it is a specific authority.

13 U.S.C. is listed as an authority for 28 CFR Part 513, thus the regulation is authorized by the statute. The statute mandates the Secretary of Commerce to take censuses, but does not mandate the specific regulations found in 28 CFR Part 513.

13 U.S.C. § 132 doesn’t outline any specific regulatory task for the agency beyond stating that Title 13 provisions control in cases of conflict. Citing “13 U.S.C” generally is not a specific delegation. The agency appears to be relying on a broader interpretation of its authority under Title 13, which constitutes a General Authority delegation.

While 13 U.S.C. § 132 doesn’t directly mandate specific regulations about access to records, it acknowledges the Department of Commerce’s authority related to Title 13. The regulation cites “13 U.S.C.” generally as an authority, suggesting the statute authorizes the regulation. It doesn’t explicitly mandate the specific content of 28 CFR Part 513, but it falls within the realm of authorized rulemaking.

Although 13 U.S.C. § 14 has been repealed, when the statute was active it provided for reimbursement between appropriations, giving the agency a specific instruction. While not mandating rulemaking, it clearly addressed a specific gap.

The regulation, 28 CFR Part 513, cites 13 U.S.C. in its authority section. This implies that the statute authorizes the regulation, however, as the statute has been repealed, it is authorized but not mandated, as the regulation does not act as a direct instruction.

While the statute provides broad authority to the Secretary, section 141(c) specifically instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task (reporting tabulations to states and localities for legislative apportionment and districting), therefore meeting the criteria for Specific Authority.

13 U.S.C. 141(c) directly mandates the Secretary to report tabulations of population to states and localities. 15 CFR Part 101 explicitly implements this subsection of the statute.

Although 13 U.S.C. section 141 sets forth the basic duty of taking a census, it does not specifically address, delegate or instruct the agency to develop regulations on access to DOJ/FBI records. It gives broad authority to the Secretary of Commerce related to the census but doesn’t address the specifics found in the CFR.

The statute, 13 U.S.C. § 141, explicitly authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to conduct censuses and related activities. While the regulation, 28 CFR Part 513, concerns access to records held by the Department of Justice, including the FBI/NCIC information, the statute is cited as an authority for the regulation, implying a relationship, but it neither directly mandates nor explicitly authorizes the specific regulations on access to those records. The statute concerns the census and the regulation concerns DOJ records access, thus the relationship is indirect.

While the statute directs the Secretary to collect statistics on religious bodies, it doesn’t specify how to collect, store, or disseminate this information, or other specific regulatory tasks. This broad grant of authority, coupled with the specific mention of “13 U.S.C.” in the regulation’s authority section, constitutes a General Authority Delegation as it provides rulemaking authority without identifying precise regulatory actions.

The statute (13 U.S. Code § 102) authorizes the Secretary to collect statistics relating to religious bodies, but it does not mandate it. The regulation (28 CFR Part 513) is related because 13 USC is explicitly listed in the authority section, indicating that the statute authorizes the regulation, even though it does not directly mandate its specifics.

While 13 U.S.C. is listed as an authority for 28 CFR Part 513, the regulation deals with “Access to Records” generally, a broad grant of rulemaking power concerning access to information. The statute, 13 U.S.C. 103, specifically concerns designation of reports. The regulation’s authority is more related to general statutory mandates about how agencies should handle public information.

13 U.S.C. is listed as authority, but the regulation is not directly mandated by 13 USC 103. The statute authorizes data collection and naming, but the regulation provides access to records, going beyond what is mandated by the statute, which concerns the naming of reports.

The statute provides broad authority to appropriate funds “as may be necessary to carry out all provisions of this title.” It doesn’t identify a specific regulatory task or gap to be filled.

The statute authorizes appropriations to carry out the provisions of Title 13, which implies authorization for regulations necessary to implement those provisions. However, it doesn’t directly mandate any specific regulation.

While the statute specifies “mechanical and electronic development work,” the authorization is broadly related to furthering the “functions and duties of carrying out the purposes of this title.” This lack of specific regulatory tasks and open-ended language (“as he determines is needed”) classifies it as a general authority delegation.

13 U.S.C. § 12 authorizes the Secretary to conduct mechanical and electronic development work. 28 CFR Part 513, governing access to records, cites 13 U.S.C. as authority. Therefore, the statute authorizes, but does not mandate, the regulation. The exact relationship between the “development work” authorized in the statute and the “access to records” addressed in the regulation is indirect, but the regulation clearly invokes Title 13 of the U.S. Code.

The statute delegates authority to the Secretary to contract with educational and research organizations for the preparation of specific types of materials (monographs, reports, and materials of a similar nature). While broad, the language focuses the agency’s authority onto specific types of tasks. Even if the phrasing includes open-ended wording like “materials of similar nature”, it remains a specific task delegation as it focuses on the particular means that congress intended the secretary to utilize.

13 U.S.C. § 13 authorizes the Secretary to contract for specific services (preparation of reports). While it grants authority, it doesn’t mandate any specific regulation concerning access to records or information disclosure related to those contracts. The relationship is “authorized but not mandated” because while Title 13 U.S.C. is cited as authority for 28 CFR Part 513, it is the broader statutory scheme of Title 13, and not specifically section 13 which mandates or governs access to Census records or the FBI/NCIC information. The regulation includes 13 U.S.C. in its authority section, but the link to Section 13 is weak.

The statute identifies specific regulatory tasks for both the Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of the Treasury. For the Comptroller, it is designating legal holidays in specific emergency situations, while for the Secretary, it is regulating banking operations during a Presidential-declared emergency.

12 U.S.C. § 95(b)(1) directly mandates the Comptroller of the Currency may designate legal holidays. 12 U.S.C. § 95(a) directly allows the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe regulations, limitations and restrictions, with Presidential approval, on member banks during an emergency period declared by the President.

Although 12 U.S.C. § 95a grants power to regulate transactions in foreign exchange, gold, silver, property transfers, and vested interests, it does so without specifying which regulations are needed in the context of general enforcement provisions of Customs regulations. The statute is broad and doesn’t identify particular tasks or gaps, thus it functions as a general authorization for regulations concerning these subject matters.

12 U.S.C. 95a is listed in the authority section for 19 CFR § 161.2, indicating that the regulation is authorized by the statute. The statute’s omission and dual classification suggest flexibility in its application, supporting the authorized but not mandated relationship.

While 13 U.S.C provides the basis for the Census Bureau and the Secretary of Commerce to function, the regulation 28 CFR Part 513 is under the Department of Justice, not the Department of Commerce or the Census Bureau. Given the lack of a direct mandate and the breadth of the regulation (Access to Records) in relation to the definition section of the statute, this is best classified as a general authority delegation or related authority.

13 U.S.C. is listed in the authority section of the regulation, suggesting the regulation is authorized by the statute. However, the statute, which defines terms, does not explicitly mandate the specific access to records regulations outlined in 28 CFR Part 513.

While 13 U.S.C. appears in the authority section of the regulation, the specific statute provided (13 U.S.C. § 10) is repealed. Furthermore, even when active, it only concerned free mailing of census material. It doesn’t give specific instructions regarding access to records in the way that 28 CFR Part 513 defines. The presence of other, broader statutes (5 U.S.C. 552, 552a, etc.) in the Authority section suggests the agency is relying on a general delegation to manage information and records.

The regulation, 28 CFR Part 513, cites 13 U.S.C. in its authority section. This indicates that the statute authorizes the regulation, but the statute itself (13 U.S.C. § 10) is about free transmittal of official mail related to census matters and is REPEALED. Therefore, the regulation is authorized, but not mandated, by the statute. The repeal makes the link weaker but still present.

While the statute grants the Secretary discretion, it does so within the specific regulatory task of collecting and publishing statistics on defective, dependent, and delinquent classes, and crime. It also identifies specific questions the Secretary “shall” include in the statistical compilation. This directs the agency to a particular regulatory task, meeting the criteria for Specific Authority.

13 U.S.C. is explicitly listed in the authority section of the regulation. This indicates that the regulation is authorized by the statute. The statute states that the Secretary “may” collect statistics, which suggests that it is authorized but not mandated.

The statute provides a broad grant of rulemaking authority to the Comptroller to “carry out the responsibilities of the office.” It doesn’t instruct the agency to regulate a specific issue or fill a specific regulatory gap beyond those responsibilities. The statute enables regulation but doesn’t specify what to regulate beyond general responsibilities.

12 U.S.C. § 93a authorizes the Comptroller of the Currency to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office. The regulation, 12 CFR Part 52, concerns “regulatory reporting,” which falls within the scope of the Comptroller’s responsibilities. The statute provides the authority for the regulation, but does not mandate it.

The statute grants broad rulemaking authority to the Comptroller of the Currency to carry out the responsibilities of the office, without specifying the particular regulatory tasks to be addressed. It’s a delegation to regulate generally within the scope of the agency’s duties, making it a General Authority delegation.

12 U.S.C. § 93a authorizes the Comptroller of the Currency to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office. The regulation, 12 CFR Part 6, concerns prompt corrective action for banks, which falls within the general scope of the Comptroller’s responsibilities. The statute authorizes rulemaking but does not explicitly mandate this specific regulation.

The statute provides broad authority to the Comptroller of the Currency to prescribe rules and regulations to “carry out the responsibilities of the office.” It doesn’t identify a specific regulatory task or gap that needs addressing, except to carve out two exceptions.

12 U.S.C. § 93a “authorized” the Comptroller of the Currency to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office. It does not mandate specific rulemaking, but grants the authority to do so.

While the statute limits the Comptroller of Currency’s authority in certain domains (section 36 of this title, or to securities activities of National Banks under the Act commonly known as the “Glass-Steagall Act”), it broadly grants rulemaking authority to “carry out the responsibilities of the office.” This lack of specificity concerning regulatory tasks aligns it with the General Authority delegation category.

The statute 12 U.S.C. § 93a “authorizes” the Comptroller of the Currency to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office. It grants the power but does not explicitly mandate specific regulations to be promulgated. This falls under the “authorized but not mandated” category.

The statute provides broad rulemaking authority to the Comptroller of the Currency to “carry out the responsibilities of the office.” It does not identify any specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed through rulemaking, making it a general delegation of authority.

The statute “authorizes” the Comptroller of the Currency to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office, but it does not “mandate” any specific regulation. The language is permissive (“is authorized”) and does not direct the agency to issue any particular rule.

The statute provides broad authority to the Comptroller of the Currency to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office. It does not identify specific regulatory tasks or gaps that need to be addressed, which makes it a general delegation.

The regulation cites 12 U.S.C. § 93a as one of the authorities. This indicates that the statute directly mandates or authorizes the regulation. After reading the statute, the language “the Comptroller of the Currency is authorized to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the responsibilities of the office” suggests a direct mandate to create regulations related to the Comptroller’s responsibilities, which includes the subject matter of the listed regulation.