Database Search Results

The statute provides specific instructions and requirements regarding the labeling of art materials, detailing the content of the labels, the criteria for determining hazards, and the process for revising standards. The statute is precise and targeted, instructing the agency on a specific regulatory task.

15 U.S.C. § 1277(a) directly mandates the regulation of art materials labeling by deeming the ASTM standard D-4236, as modified by subsection (b), to be a regulation issued by the Commission.

This statute provides specific instructions to the Commission (likely the CPSC). It defines the scope of “art material,” sets specific labeling requirements (name/address of producer, telephone number, statement regarding use by children), addresses container size issues, incorporates consideration of toxicological opinions, and requires guidelines for determining chronic hazards. While the phrase “adequately protect the public interest” in subsection (c) uses an open-ended term, the overall delegation is quite specific. Subsection (d) also mandates the agency to create guidelines that specify criteria for determining the existence of a chronic hazard, with explicit factors that must be included.

The statute directly mandates that the requirements for labeling of art materials set forth in ASTM standard D-4236, as modified by subsection (b), are deemed a regulation issued by the Commission.

The statute provides specific instructions to the CPSC regarding the labeling of toys and games, including details about the age range of children, the types of toys and games covered (balloons, small balls, marbles), and the content/placement of cautionary statements. Additionally, subsection (c)(3) explicitly instructs the CPSC to promulgate regulations to effectuate this section with respect to catalogues and other printed material, detailing timelines and subjects for the regulations. These instructions fall under Specific Authority because it directs the agency to address a particular regulatory task.

The statute 15 U.S.C. § 1278 directly mandates the labeling requirements for certain toys and games and explicitly directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to promulgate regulations to effectuate the section, particularly concerning advertising in catalogues and other printed material.

While the regulation (16 CFR Part 1199) is rooted in 15 U.S.C. 1251-1289, which covers the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. Specifically, the regulation addresses phthalates. While the original provided statue speaks to small parts, in both cases, the statute instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task (addressing hazardous substances in toys) even if using terms like “appropriate” when allowing the Commission to determine the upper age limit. The statutes task is the safety of children, this allows for specific authority.

While 15 U.S.C. § 1278 concerns the labeling of toys and games with cautionary statements about small parts, and 16 CFR Part 1199 addresses phthalates in children’s toys and child care articles, they are related in the sense that both concern the safety of children’s products. However, the statute does not directly mandate regulations about phthalates, nor does it explicitly authorize them. The statute focuses on choking hazards from small parts, while the regulation addresses chemical hazards from phthalates.

The statute instructs the Commission to establish the Board and defines the Board’s specific advisory tasks related to precautionary labeling, referencing specific sections (1261(p)(1) and 1262(b)) for proper labeling, hazard statements, first-aid instructions, and exemptions.

15 U.S.C. § 1275 directly mandates the establishment of a Toxicological Advisory Board by the Commission.

The statute specifically directs the Commission to establish an advisory board focused on a particular regulatory area (precautionary labeling for hazardous substances). It outlines specific tasks for the board, such as reviewing and recommending revisions to labeling requirements. This falls under the definition of a Specific Authority Delegation, as it instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task, even though it uses open-ended terms like “appropriate” in the context of recommendations.

The statute explicitly authorizes the Commission to establish a Toxicological Advisory Board and task it with providing advice and recommendations on precautionary labeling for hazardous substances. While the statute mandates the establishment of the board, it does not directly mandate the specific regulations that the agency might promulgate as a result of the board’s recommendations.

Although 15 U.S.C. § 1276 concerns regulations related to hazardous substances, it doesn’t provide specific instructions or guidelines for agency rulemaking beyond setting up a process for congressional review. It outlines a procedure for congressional disapproval, but it doesn’t specify what types of regulations the agency should issue or how it should create rules, which means it falls into the General Authority category.

15 U.S.C. § 1276 is explicitly listed in the authority section for 16 CFR Part 1031. This indicates that the regulation is authorized by the statute, but the statute does not directly mandate the specific content of the regulation regarding Commission participation in voluntary standards activities. The statute outlines a congressional veto process, which implies agency rulemaking authority related to hazardous substances, but doesn’t mandate participation in voluntary standards.

The referenced statutes, 15 U.S.C. 1261 and 1262, provide broader authority to regulate hazardous substances, which falls under the category of General Authority. Though the reference to specific subsections of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act might suggest specific authority, the overarching authority to regulate hazardous substances comes from the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, which grants the Commission broad rulemaking authority.

The statute outlines a procedure for Congressional review of regulations promulgated under specific sections of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. While related to the agency’s rulemaking authority, it neither directly mandates nor explicitly authorizes the creation of those regulations. It only governs a process to potentially veto them. The authorization of the regulation itself would stem from 15 U.S.C. 1261(q)(1) or 1262(e), which this section references.

While 15 U.S.C. 1261-1278 provide the CPSC general authority to regulate hazardous substances, Section 1276 outlines a very specific task: the transmission of certain regulations to Congress, and the procedure by which congress can reject said regulations. This constitutes a specific procedure beyond the initial granting of authority.

The statute explicitly mandates that the Commission transmit regulations to Congress, and describes a specific procedure for Congressional disapproval.

The statute provides a specific regulatory task: addressing hazards associated with banned hazardous substances and defective toys. While it uses terms like “adequately protect the public” and “substantial risk of injury,” it instructs the agency on actions like public notice, repair, replacement, or refund to remedy specific problems associated with hazardous or defective products. This level of direction classifies it as a specific authority delegation. Further, The regulation focuses on phthalates, which are hazardous substances, so the statute directly applies

The statute, 15 U.S.C. § 1274, authorizes the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to take specific actions regarding banned hazardous substances, including notification, repair, replacement, or refund. While the statute doesn’t mandate specific regulations about inaccessible parts containing phthalates, it authorizes the agency to take actions it deems necessary to protect the public from banned hazardous substances and toys or articles intended for children that contain defects that create a substantial risk of injury. Regulations about phthalates in toys and child care articles fall under this authorized scope.

The statute specifically instructs the CPSC regarding the regulatory tasks. 15 U.S.C. § 1274 explicitly describes situations (banned hazardous substances, defective toys posing a substantial risk of injury) where the Commission has the power to act. The actions the Commission can take are also explicitly defined (public notice, mailing notice, repair, replacement, refund, submitting a plan, prohibiting manufacturing/distribution/importing). It provides the agency with a defined scope and sets of actions, even though discretionary decisions are needed to make a regulatory decision under the language in the statute.

The statute, 15 U.S.C. § 1274, authorizes the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to take specific remedial actions regarding banned hazardous substances and defective toys. The statute outlines the types of regulations the CPSC may make. The statute does not mandate specific regulations, nor does it preclude the agency from choosing to act through adjudication. The agency is authorized to regulate, but is not required to do so.

The statute provides the Commission with the authority to determine that an article or substance is banned. If so, this statute then allows the Commission to order specific actions (notification, repair, replacement, refund). The statute directly instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task.

The statute 15 U.S.C. 1261-1276 provides the statutory authority for 21 CFR Part 1230. The statute authorizes the agency to regulate hazardous substances, but it does not mandate the specific regulations found in Part 1230. The regulations are authorized but not directly mandated.

The statute specifically instructs the Commission to establish the Toxicological Advisory Board and defines its functions, including advising on precautionary labeling. While “appropriate” recommendations are mentioned, the delegation is tied to specific regulatory tasks related to hazardous substance labeling.

15 U.S.C. § 1275 falls within the range of statutes cited (15 U.S.C. 1261-1276) as authority for 16 CFR Part 1031. The statute authorizes the establishment of the Toxicological Advisory Board and its function, but it doesn’t mandate specific regulations regarding participation in voluntary standards activities.

15 U.S.C. § 1275 specifically directs the Commission (Consumer Product Safety Commission) to establish a Toxicological Advisory Board to provide advice on precautionary labeling for hazardous substances, including descriptions of hazards, precautionary measures, and first-aid treatment. While the phthalates rule is not directly mentioned, the statute establishes a framework and advisory structure related to hazardous substances, of which phthalates are an example. The statute refers to the Commission’s responsibilities under sections 1261 and 1262, related to defining and labeling hazardous substances, thereby delegating specific authority even with potentially open-ended terms like “appropriate” for labeling.

15 U.S.C. § 1275 directly mandates the establishment of a Toxicological Advisory Board. 16 CFR Part 1199 concerns phthalates in children’s toys and child care articles. While both relate to hazardous substances and product safety under the purview of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the statute pertains to establishing an advisory board, whereas the regulation addresses a specific chemical substance. The statute does not explicitly authorize the regulation, but the regulation is related to the statute”™s broader goal of reducing harm from hazardous substances.

The statute specifically instructs the Secretary of Treasury to deliver samples to the Commission and the Commission to examine the samples for hazardous materials, and authorize actions such as relabeling, destruction, or export. It also sets a timeframe for exporting rejected hazardous substances. These specific instructions indicate a specific authority delegation.

The statute (15 U.S.C. § 1273) directly mandates the Secretary of the Treasury and the Commission to take specific actions regarding imported hazardous substances, providing a clear framework for their roles and responsibilities. The statute also grants the Commission the authority to create regulations, directly mandating the statute regulation relationship.

The statute provides detailed instructions on specific regulatory tasks, including giving public notice, mailing notice to manufacturers/distributors/dealers, specifying the form and content of notices, ordering repairs, replacements, or refunds, and submitting plans. While the agency has some discretion on how to implement these remedies, the statute clearly defines the actions the agency can take. The use of “may order” does not make it a General Authority, since the statute still directs WHAT actions are available.

The statute (15 U.S.C. § 1274) authorizes the Commission to take certain actions regarding banned hazardous substances, but it does not mandate that the agency must promulgate specific regulations regarding public notice of meetings. The regulation (16 CFR Part 1011) concerns public notice of agency activities, including meetings, and the authority section explicitly cites 15 U.S.C. 1261-74. The statute authorizes, but doesn’t mandate, these types of regulations.

While 15 U.S.C. 1274 deals with specific actions regarding banned hazardous substances and defective toys, it doesn’t directly instruct the agency to create a meetings policy. The statute provides a framework for addressing hazardous products, and the agency uses its general rulemaking authority to develop procedures like a meetings policy to effectively implement and administer the statute’s provisions. The link is indirect but reasonable within the overall statutory framework, but this makes it fall under a broader authority to ensure procedural fairness.

15 U.S.C. 1274 is listed under the authority section of 16 CFR Part 1012, which authorizes the Commission to establish regulations concerning meetings between agency personnel and outside parties. The statute itself doesn’t mandate the creation of this specific type of meetings policy, but it does authorize the Commission to issue regulations regarding hazardous substances and the safety of toys and other articles intended for use by children. This broad authority provides the basis for the meetings policy to ensure transparency and fairness in the Commission’s decision-making process, which relates to its oversight responsibilities under the Act.

15 U.S.C. § 1274 specifically empowers the Consumer Product Safety Commission to take remedial actions regarding banned hazardous substances and defective toys. While the statute doesn’t directly command regulations about information disclosure and employee testimony in private litigation, such regulations are reasonably related to and necessary for implementing and enforcing the specific remedial actions authorized by the statute. The statute allows the commission to determine, after a hearing, whether notification or remedial action is required, implying the power to gather and disclose information as part of that process and defend their actions in court.

15 U.S.C. 1274 is listed in the authority section of 16 CFR Part 1016, indicating that it authorizes the regulation, but does not specifically mandate the policies and procedures for information disclosure and employee testimony in private litigation covered by the regulation.

The statute gives the Commission authority to deal with banned hazardous substances and articles intended for use by children, and lists several statutes for authority. The delegation is considered a general authority because it provides broad rulemaking authority related to hazardous substances and consumer protection without identifying specific regulatory tasks relating to voluntary standards.

The statute authorizes the Commission to take remedial actions regarding banned hazardous substances and defective toys, but it doesn’t mandate that the Commission must issue regulations governing voluntary standards activities. The regulation focuses on the Commission’s involvement in voluntary standards activities. The statute gives the CPSC the authority to implement the requirements listed in the statute, but the regulation is more about the CPSC’s internal processes concerning its participation in voluntary standards activities.

The statute specifically authorizes the Commission (formerly the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare) to require statements regarding the exportation of misbranded or banned hazardous substances, including the content of those statements and circumstances for exemptions. This goes beyond a general grant of authority and directs the agency towards a particular regulatory goal.

15 U.S.C. § 1273 is explicitly listed in the “Authority” section for 16 CFR Part 1019. This indicates a direct mandate for the regulation.

The statute provides specific instructions on how the Commission and the Secretary of Treasury are to regulate the import and export of hazardous materials. It details procedures for sampling, examination, refusal of admission, and requires regulations for destruction, relabeling, bonds, supervision, expenses, and exportation notifications. The statute specifically lists the items to be regulated and leaves few if any gaps to be filled.

15 U.S.C. § 1273 explicitly directs the Secretary of the Treasury and the Commission (formerly the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, now the Consumer Product Safety Commission) to take specific actions regarding imported hazardous substances, including sampling, examination, refusal of admission, destruction, relabeling, and exportation, with certain actions to be done “under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury” or “in accordance with regulations.” Thus, the statute directly mandates the agency to issue regulations to carry out its provisions.

The statute, specifically 15 U.S.C. § 1273, outlines specific regulatory tasks such as the refusal of admission of hazardous substances, the relabeling or other action to bring the hazardous substance into compliance, and the filing requirements for exporting misbranded or banned hazardous substances. The regulation (16 CFR Part 1119) outlines the civil penalty factors the Commission must consider when assessing penalties for violations of these regulatory tasks. The statute uses terms like “in accordance with regulations” which is an open ended term that still clearly instructs the agency on a specific regulatory task.

15 U.S.C. § 1273 is explicitly listed in the “Authority” section of 16 CFR Part 1119, indicating that the regulation is authorized by the statute. The statute discusses the process of importing hazardous materials and gives the commission the ability to create regulations surrounding this process. Thus it is authorized, but not mandated.

While 15 U.S.C. 1273 discusses imports and hazardous substances, and the regulation addresses phthalates in children’s toys, the cited U.S.C. 1251-1289 (which is actually the entirety of the “Federal Hazardous Substances Act”) gives broad power to the CPSC to create and enforce regulations for hazardous substances, without explicitly mentioning specific regulatory tasks. Therefore, it is a general delegation.

15 U.S.C. 1251-1289 is cited as the authority for 16 CFR Part 1199. This indicates that the statute authorizes the regulation, but it is not directly mandated.

The statute provides specific instructions regarding the regulation of imported and exported hazardous substances. It dictates the process for sampling, examination, refusal of admission, destruction, export, relabeling, and notification procedures. The statute specifically delegates to the Commission the authority to require particular information from exporters by regulation.

The statute directly mandates that the Secretary of Treasury deliver samples to the Commission and prescribe regulations for the destruction or export of refused hazardous substances. It also directly mandates the Commission to request samples, examine them, and notify foreign governments of exported misbranded or banned substances and require information by regulation.

The statute grants the Commission the authority to publish reports summarizing judgments, decrees, or court orders and disseminate information regarding hazardous substances, particularly in situations involving imminent danger to health. The language related to summarizing legal outcomes and disseminating information in cases of “imminent danger to health” provides sufficient specificity to qualify as Specific Authority delegation.

The statute grants the Commission the authority to publish reports and disseminate information regarding hazardous substances, but it does not mandate that they do so. The word “may” indicates the agency’s discretion.